Use of DNA adduct and histopathological defects as indications for bio-persistence potency of zinc oxide nanoparticles in gastropod, Monacha cartusiana (Mǜller) after short-term exposure

Article information

Environ Anal Health Toxicol. 2022;37.e2022025

Publication date (electronic) : 2022 September 8

doi : https://doi.org/10.5620/eaht.2022025

Khaled Yassin Abdel-Halim ¹^,

, Safaa Ramadan Osman ¹, Atef Mohamed Khedr Nassar ²

, Alaa Khozimy ²

, Heba Mohamed El-Danasoury ³

¹Mammalian & Aquatic Toxicology Department, Central Agricultural Pesticides Laboratory (CAPL), Agricultural Research Center (ARC), 12618-Dokki, Giza, Egypt

²Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Damanhour University, PO Box 59, Damanhour, El-Beheira, Egypt

³Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt

^*Correspondence: khaled_yassen68@yahoo.com

Received 2022 June 7; Accepted 2022 August 22.

Abstract

The cytotoxic effects of metallic nanoparticles (MNPs) might be revealed in genomic and histopathological defects. Therefore current study aimed to assess the bio-persistence and adverse effects potency of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONPs) in the gastropod, Monacha cartusiana. Gastropods were exposed to 74 μg/mL for 14 d then the DNA adduct and histopathological defect profiles were assessed. The results demonstrated significant decline in the estimated genomic template stability (GTS%) in haemolymph and digestive gland ranging from 10.0 to 42.9% in treated animals compared to controls. In the treated and recovered snails, randomly amplified polymorphic (RAPD)-DNA showed the appearance and/or disappearance of DNA bands, indicating DNA damage due to the cytotoxicity of ZnONPs on gastropods. Significant defects in microvilli (MV), nucleus (N), mitochondria (M), and execratory glands (EXG) were noticed in the treated individuals with respect to controls. The remaining live animals were subjected to a recovery period (14 d, without treatment) and slight recovery profiles were reported for both measures compared to the control group. The recovery pattern was recognized in the nucleus/cytoplasm ratio with 0.186 and 0.428 in the treated and recovered groups concerning their control (0.176). The studied parameters reported herein might be reliable tools to assess accumulation and bio-persistence patterns of NPs in the organisms for short-term exposure indicating the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects. Also, gastropods may provide simple models for evaluating the ecotoxicological effects of nanomaterials.

Keywords: zinc oxide nanoparticles; gastropods; DNA adduct; histopathological defects; short-term exposure

Introduction

Nanotechnology has attained an exceptional position, especially in biotechnology, which has an unlimited character to support life superiority [1]. Metallic nanoparticles (MNPs), such as zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONPs), are useful in a variety of agricultural (pesticide manufacturing and antimicrobial agents), industrial, and medical applications (including sun protection creams and ointments to treat skin disorders and bioimaging [2–6]. Moreover, NMs could interfere with the aquatic ecosystems triggering a prospective risk to the aquatic creatures. As a result, legalizing the safe limits of NMs for both occupational and environmental models is crucial. Also, it is vital to develop effective and sensitive analytical methods for the environmental monitoring of NMs [7,8]. A diversity of bioindicators might be used to study the potential toxicity of NMs. For example, ZnONPs showed ecotoxicological effects on zooplankton [9], phytoplankton [10], amphibians [11], fish [12], reptiles [13], mammals [14,15], snails [16] and plants [17]. Specifically, the exposure of guppy (Poecilia reticulata) to zinc sulfate (at 10, 50, and 100 μg/L) and ZnONPs increased DNA damage after 48 h and antioxidant enzymes after 21 d, suggesting that NMs including the ZnNPs' have genotoxic impacts [18]. It could incidentally stimulate oxidative damage through the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS).

Oxidative stress (OXS) is a useful indicator for determining the ecotoxicity of ZnONPs against various organisms [21–23]. The OXS is the primary mechanism proposed to illustrate NM's toxicity [24]. ROS levels in haemocytes have been used to quantify OXS in terrestrial environments [25] and marine [26]. Additionally, the generation of ROS might induce DNA breakage [27], protein carbonylation [28], lipid peroxidation [26,29], reaction with oxidative organelles, e.g., mitochondria [30], and apoptosis [31].

The genotoxicity was evaluated by examining variations in DNA profiles independent of band shifts and intensity [32,33] and the gain and loss of bands [34,35]. According to several studies, DNA fingerprints could be used as a functional biomarker assay in toxicology. Therefore, several aquatic and terrestrial models were employed to screen xenobiotic toxicity, owing to their ability to bioaccumulate metals, adapt to numerous environments, and ease of rearing in diverse climatic conditions. Similarly, the gastropods were used as biomarkers for DNA damage. Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity were induced by different substances including NMs (ZnNPs) in different species of gastropods, e.g., Nerita chanaeleon [36], Morula granulata [37], Lymnaea luteola [38], and M. cartusiana [39]. Consequently, it was an excellent bioindicator class [40]. Therefore, the current study aimed to look at DNA adducts and histopathological changes in the land snail (M. cartusiana) caused by short-term exposure to sub-lethal levels of ZnONPs.

Materials and Methods

Preparation of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONPs)

The ZnONPs were produced in an alcoholic medium through the condensation and hydrolysis of zinc acetate dehydrates at low-temperature conditions by potassium hydroxide. The precipitate was formed and distributed in a combination of methanol and chloroform, cleaned with deionized water, and dried at 100 °C for 15 min [41].

Characterization of ZnONPs

The size and shape of ZnO powder's aliquot deposited on a copper grid were investigated using the JOEL Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM, JSM5300). To determine the purity of the prepared NPs, an X-ray Oxford detector unit (model 6647, England) was used in conjunction with the SEM (JOEL, JSM5300) and Oxford detector unit of X-ray (model 6647, England). A double beam UV-VIS spectrophotometer (HEIλOS α v 4.6 Serial No 111518 Thermo Spectronic) was used to analyze the ZnONPs suspension's optical absorption at room temperature in the range of 200 to 800 nm.

Experimental design

Examined land snail

The snail, M. cartusiana (Müller), was chosen as the subject of the experiments. Healthy individuals weighing 2.5 ±0.7 g were obtained from Delta Egypt's clover farms. Every 100 individuals were kept in an aerated wooden cage with dimensions of 40×40×40 cm for 14 d under laboratory conditions (25±2 °C; 12:12 h light/dark and 63±2% relative humidity). Animals were fed leaves of lettuce ad libitum.

Toxicity test

The animals were categorized into three replicates, each of 20 individuals. As a control group, land snails were fed lettuce leaves (toxicant free). Treated animals were fed lettuce leaves that were soaked in 74 μg/mL for two weeks, representing 0.1 of the LC₅₀ value reported by Abdel-Halim et al. [16]. They were monitored daily. Some of the living animals were collected for toxicological analyses. A 40 mm needle connected with a sterilized 10 mL syringe was cautiously inserted below the shell from the hemocoel beside the right side of the skull to collect the haemolymph. The fluid was collected in anticoagulant vials and kept at −20 °C until it was analyzed. The digestive glands were separated from the animals and kept at −20 °C until being analyzed.

Recovery experiment

Following the toxicity experiment, the live animals have nourished with lettuce leaves (toxicant-free) for 14 d and animals were monitored daily. Then samples were taken in the manner above-mentioned.

Fragmentation of DNA

Extraction of DNA

A 50 mg of the digestive glands or 100 μL of the haemolymph fluid were aliquoted and mixed with 940 μL of lysis buffer [100 mM EDTA, pH 8.0; 200 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0; 250 mM NaCl), 30 μl proteinase K (10 mg/mL) and 30 μL 20% SDS]. In a water bath, the contents were kept at 48 °C for 45–50 min. Phenol, chloroform, and isoamyl were added with a ratio of 25:24:1 (v/v), gently inverted for 10 min and centrifuged at 9200×g for 10 min. Supernatants were transferred into new 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes. After that, DNA was precipitated by adding equivalent volumes of isopropanol to 0.2 volume of 10 M ammonium acetate, tenderly inverting several times, and centrifuging at 13200 g for 10 min. The pellet was quickly cleaned in 500 μL of 70% ethanol, air-dried, and re-suspended in 200 μL of sterilized water/TE buffer [42].

The purity factor (A₂₆₀/A₂₈₀ nm) was quantified spectrophotometrically after assuring the complete solubility of DNA. Its reliability was confirmed by loading 10 μL of the prepared DNA (2 μL extracted DNA, 2 μL dye, and 6 μL sterilized water) on a 0.7 percent agarose gel and staining with ethidium bromide and the quantity and quality compared to 0.2 μL of DNA standard marker.

ISSR conditions and preparations

The PCR amplification was performed using six Inter Simple Sequence Repeats (ISSRs) primers to differentiate and fingerprint six samples: (1) control haemolymph, (2) control tissue, (3) treatment haemolymph, (4) treatment tissue, (5) recovered individuals' haemolymph, and (6) recovered individual tissue (Table 1). A total volume (25 μL) was used for the amplification, including 2 μL DNA, 2 μL primer, 2.5 μL 10X buffer, 2.5 μL MgCl₂ (50 mM), 2.5 μL dNTPs (4 mM), and 0.2 μL (5 units/μL) Taq DNA polymerase (Promega Germany). It was carried out using an automated thermal cycler with the following PCR conditions: one cycle at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles [1 min at 94 °C, 75 seconds of temperature annealing for each primer as itemized in Table 1 and 2 min at 72 °C], and finally a final extension for 10 min at 72 °C. Gel electrophoresis in a 1 percent (w/v) agarose gel in TBE buffer at 120 V for 30 min separated the PCR products. The bands were then noticed with ethidium bromide staining and photographed with a gel documentation system (Bio-Rad Gel Doc., 2000).

Table 1

List of used ISSR primers, their sequences, and annealing temperatures.

Treatments' phylogenetic relationships

To calculate the pairwise difference matrix among the treatments, the Gene-Profiler-Eval computer application was performed to record variations in separated bands with each primer of ISSRs markers. Nei Li's coefficient, which is included in the Multivariate Statistical Package (MVSP) Version 3.1 computer program, was used to perform genetic comparisons based on ISSR fingerprints among treatments. The Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Means (UPGMA) used Nei Li's similarity coefficient to cluster the data matrix [43].

Genomic template stability

The following formula was used to estimate genomic template stability (GTS percent):

(1) GTS%=1-an×100

where; a represents the average number of polymorphic bands discovered in each treated sample and n represents the total number of bands in control. Compared to the control profile, polymorphism in the RAPD profile comprises the disappearance of a regular band and the introduction of a new band [44].

Examination of the ultrastructure

The individuals from both treatments and control groups were dissected, and the digestive glands were taken. Small fragments were fixed as quickly as possible with 2 mL of 2.5% glutaraldehyde diluted in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, and kept at 4 °C until the analysis. The fixed tissues were rinsed in a phosphate buffer solution of 0.1 M, pH 7.2. After that, it was washed with buffer for 2 min before being submerged in 1% osmium tetraoxide (OsO₄) for 1–2 h at 4 °C. The samples were dehydrated for 5 min with an increasing concentration of acetone (25, 50, 75, and 100%). The tissues were infiltrated with propylene oxide after being dehydrated in 100% acetone. The specimen was embedded in Epon Araldite for 48 h at room temperature. Capsulated samples were sectioned at 20–30 nm thickness using an Ultratome machine. The sections were obtained on metal mesh (grids) and stained with toluidine blue for orientation. The grids were dyed for 5 min with 4% uranyl acetate and then rinsed with pure water. After rinsing, the grids were stained for 5 min with 1% lead acetate, rinsed again in water, and stored in a grid box until they were examined [45]. The grids were viewed using a Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) (JOEL 1400 Plus, Japan) to understand the cell changes. As necessary, a sequence of bright–field imaging was used.

Statistical analysis

All data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), underwent analysis of variance (ANOVA), and means were assessed to significance using the least significant difference (LSD) method at a probability of 0.05 [46]. Furthermore, according to the fisher distribution, line regression with ^* and ^** is significant with 5% and 1% probability levels for DNA gel pictures, respectively (Statist XL v 2.1, 2003). The principal component analysis (PCA) was used to examine multilinear regression between ZnONPs-treated and recovered snails and DNA fingerprints in the haemolymph and digestive tract [47]. To determine the diversity of histopathological investigation between treatments and the control, box plot graph analysis was made using SPSS-Version 16.

Results

Nanoparticles characterization

The UV-VIS absorbance showed an absorption band at nearly 360 nm (Figure 1a). The ZnONPs exhibited nearly spherical shapes with sizes ranging from 22 to 45 nm (Figure 1b). In addition, the elemental analysis using EDA pattern was plotted in Figure 1c exhibited domination of Zn (96.0%) of the total content of minerals in the sample.

Figure 1

Characterized patterns of ZnONPs: (a) UV-VIS spectrum of ZnONPs suspension; (b) SEM image at 35.000X; (c) XAD pattern of ZN ions percent in the prepared NPs.

Genomic DNA diversity

Different profiles were obtained when the genomic DNA of M. cartusiana animals that were exposed to 74 μg/mL of ZnONPs (Figure 2). These profiles among genetic diversities of M. cartusiana were noticed using Nei Li's coefficient embedded in the MVSP program, where a pairwise difference matrix was stated (Figure 3). Six primers were employed to amplify genomic DNA successfully. The RAPD fingerprints with varied bands ranging from 200 to 1000 bp were obtained, regulated by the state of treated and recovered animals and the used primer.

Figure 2

Agarose gel electrophoresis of poly chain reaction (RAPD-PCR) products using primers: (a) HB-14; (b) HB-09; (c) HB-12; (d) UBC811; (e) UBC868, (f) UBC840 to amplify snail, Monacha cartusiana (Mǖller): Lan (M) DNA ladder, (1) control haemo., (2) control digestive glands, (3) treatment haemo., (4) treatment digestive glands, (5) recovered haemo., and (6) recovered digestive glands after treatment of ZnONPs (74 μg/mL) for 14 d, following by recovery for the same time.

Figure 3

Variation among genetic diversities among snail, Monacha cartusiana (Mǖller) exposed to ZnONPs using similarities coefficients and dendrogram tree.

The results in Figure 4 show the relationship between treated haemolymph and digestive g. with recovery ratios. It was found that recovered haemolymph positively high associated with treated haemolymph and partially associated with treated digestive g. In the same way, recovered digestive g. positively associated with treated digestive gland. The HB-14 primer produced 5–6 bands with sizes ranging from 300 to 1000 bp (Figure 2a) with significant declined GST 20.0% (r²=0.796^*) (p<0.05) for the treated haemolymph and increased to the same value in the recovered individuals (r²=−1.377^*), respect to control (Figure 4). Also, it was declined to 14.3% for the treated digestive glands (r²=0.185) and significantly declined to 42.9% for the recovered individuals (r²=0.957^*). In case of the primer HB-09, the number of bands ranged from 5 to 7 bands with sizes from 200 to 700 bp in the digestive glands and haemolymph samples with GST values 50.0 (r²=0.818^*) and 25.0% (r²=0.413) in haemolymph and 28.0 (r²=0.55^*) and 00.0% in digestive glands for the treatment and recovery, respectively (Figure 2b). The increased pattern was recognized in the generated bands for primer HB-12. The number of bands ranged from 8–10 with sizes ranging from 200 to 1000 bp (Figure 2c) with GST values 12.5 (r²=0.407) and 25.0% (r²=0.521^*) greater than haemolymph's of control animals. HB-12 declined to 11.1% (r²=0.167) for the treatment of digestive glands, followed by increased GST in the recovered individuals.

Figure 4

Correlation matrix of ZnONPs-treated and recovered snail, Monacha cartusiana (Mǖller) and their DNA fingerprints generated from RAPD-PCR. Linear correlation between these variables was obtained after Pearson's test (p<0.05).

The primer UBC811 revealed a slight generation of bands. The number of bands was 4–7 bands in the size of 400–800 bp (Figure 2d) with increased GST% (16.6%) (r²= −0.266) compared to control in haemolymph and a significant decline to 40.0% in the digestive glands (r²= 0.655^*), respect to control. However, significant abundant bands were generated with the primer UBC868 (Figure 2e). The number of bands was 10–12 in size of 300–1000 bp, with GST having values similar in haemolymph and increased in the recovered animals to 10.0% (r²=−0.107). Also, the GST value increased to 10.0% in the treated digestive glands and declined to a steady state (0 level) in the recovered samples. Finally, slight generation was obtained using the primer UBC840, resulting in the range of 5–7 bands with sizes of 300–1000 bp (Figure 2f). Declines in GST% were conducted in the treated and recovered haemolymph with 28.6% (r²=−0.240) but increased to 33.4% (r²=0.663^*) in the treated and recovered digestive glands.

The calculated similarity coefficient among groups of individuals ranged from 0.76 to 0.89 (Figure 3). The greatest value (0.89) was observed in the control's haemolymph and digestive glands samples and between the digestive glands of the control and its treatment. A similar finding with a value (0.88) was recorded between the treatment for both haemolymph and digestive gland, with respect to the recovered haemolymph, and between the treated haemolymph and digestive g. (0.88). The least value (0.76) was noticed between the treated digestive gland and its recovered counterpart sample.

Ultrastructural investigations

The electron microscope images of the digestive gland sections from control snails (untreated) showed a firm structure of the organ at 4000X (Figures 5A and 6A). It was noticed that the completed microvilli (MV) had a regular brush border and surface area of 13.27 μm². The cells were characterized by the nucleus (N) with a regular nuclear membrane, mitochondria (M), execratory vacuoles (EXV), execratory gland (EXG), digestive cells (DC), Golgi bodies (G), and smooth endoplasmic reticulum (SER). However, in the tissue of ZnONPs-treated snail (74.0 μg/mL) (Figures 5B and 6B) at the same magnification, it was noticed a disturbed brush border of MV arising surface area with a mean value of 2.96 μm² (4.49-folds) lower than the control. Also, ZnONPs caused a destructed cell membrane, rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER), destructed and irregular execratory glands (EXG), execratory vacuoles (EXV), nucleus (N) containing eccentric nuclei (Nu), migrated and aggregated chromatin, irregular and dilated nuclear membrane, and vacuoles (V). On the other hand, sections of the digestive glands of the recovered individuals for 14 d displayed a regular brush border of MV with a mean surface area of 7.66 μm², representing 1.73-folds of the control sections at the same magnification power (Figures 5C and 6C). It was noticed significant forming of digestive cells (DC), regular cellular membranes with diluted intercellular spaces, mitochondria (M), smooth endoplasmic reticulum (SER), numerous shapes of the nucleus (N), concentric chromatin, lipid droplets (L), and slight firming of Golgi bodies (G) (Figure 6C).

Figure 5

Electron micrographs illustrate [A] section of digestive g. of control snail, Monacha cartusiana (Mǜller). It was noticed that completed microvilli (MV) with regular tubules, extensively distributed mitochondria (M), Golgi bodies (G), smooth endoplasmic reticulum (SER) and execratory cells (EXC) (head arrow); [B] section in digestive gland of ZnONPs-treated snail, H. aspersa for 14 d. It was noticed disturbed brush border of microvilli (MV), lack of mitochondria (M), irregular nuclear membrane (head arrow), nucleus (N), irregular execratory gland (EXG), and execratory vacuoles (EXV), and [C] section in digestive glands of recovered snail for 14 d after treatment with ZnONPs for the same period. It was noticed recovered regular brush border of microvilli (MV), mitochondria (M), digestive cells (DC) (head arrow), execratory gland (EXG), execratory vacuoles (EXV), smooth endoplasmic reticulum (SER), and Golgi bodies (G) [Glutaraldehyde-OsO₄ fixed uranyl acetate lead citrate-stained preparation 4000X].

Figure 6

Electron micrographs illustrate [A] section of digestive glands (control) of snail, Monacha cartusiana (Mǜller) showing nucleus (N), regular nuclear membrane (head arrow), mitochondria (M), execratory vacuoles (EXV), execratory gland (EXG) (arrow), digestive cells (DC) and Golgi bodies (G); [B] section in digestive gland of ZnONPs-treated snail, H. aspersa for 14 d showing destructed cell membrane (arrow), rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER), destructed and irregular execratory glands (EXG), execratory vacuoles (EXV), eccentric nuclei (Nu) with irregular and dilated nuclear membrane (head arrow), nucleus (N) and vacuoles (V) and [C] section in digestive gland of recovered individuals for 14 d showing significant forming of digestive cells (DC) (head arrow), regular cellular membranes (arrow), diluted intercellular spaces, mitochondria (M), smooth endoplasmic reticulum (SER), Nemours shapes of nucleus (N) with irregular nuclear membrane, lipid droplets (L) and slight Golgi bodies (G) [Glutaraldehyde-OsO₄ fixed uranyl acetate lead citrate stained preparation 4000X].

In magnified sections at 10000X, normal mitochondria (M) with lamellar cristae, Golgi bodies (G), and smooth endoplasmic reticulum (SER) were noticed in the control section (Figure 7A). In ZnONPs-treated snails, NPs accumulation in the lysosome was noticed. Also, a lack of mitochondria (M) and rough endoplasmic reticulum (SER) were identified (Figure 7B). On the other hand, the sections of the digestive glands of the recovered individuals showed mitochondria (M) forming with concentric cristae and disrupted mitochondrial membrane. Nucleus (N) with migration and chromatin aggregation is likely to be detectable in the nucleus (Figure 7C).

Figure 7

Electron micrographs illustrate [A] section of digestive g. of snail, Monacha cartusiana (Mǜller) (control) showing normal mitochondria (M) with lamellar cristae (head arrow), smooth endoplasmic reticulum (SER), cell wall (arrow), and Golgi bodies (G); [B] magnified field to obtain NPs precipitation in the lysosome (arrow), lack of mitochondria (M) and rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER), and [C] section in the digestive gland of recovered individuals showing forming of mitochondria (M) with concentric cristae and disrupted mitochondrial membranes (double arrow) and nucleus (N) with migration & aggregation of chromatin is likely to be detectable in the nucleus (head arrow) [Glutaraldehyde-OsO₄ fixed uranyl acetate lead citrate stained preparation 10000X].

The mitochondrial defects in the treated snails appeared as a slight decrease in surface area (mean; 0.161 μm²) (0.95-folds) compared to control. A significant decrease in the surface area of mitochondria of recovered individuals was noticed (mean; 0.107 μm²) (1.43-folds) (Figure 8). Also, the integrated density of mitochondria declined with 2.86-folds in the treated group, followed by 3.21-folds in the recovered one, with respect to their controls. A similar pattern was noticed in the mitochondria/cytoplasm ratio, where the treated individuals exhibited significant declines (0.0121), followed by (0.0127) in the recovered ones. On the other hand, a significant increase in surface area of the nucleus (N) with a mean of 2.333 μm² (4.11-folds) was noticed compared to control. The recovered individuals exhibited the mean surface area value of the nucleus of 3.489 μm² (6.14-folds). The same pattern was recognized in the nucleus/cytoplasm ratio with values of 0.186 and 0.428 in the treated and recovered groups with respect to their control (0.176).

Figure 8

Estimation of images of snail, Monacha cartusiana (Mǖller) sections for (a) surface area (μm²), (b) nucleus/cytoplasm and mitochondria/cytoplasm ratios, and (c) integrated density of microvilli and mitochondria in control, ZnONPs-treated snails (74 μg/mL) for 14 d and recovered snails, respectively.

Discussion

The obtained data showed genotoxicity (DNA adduct) and cytotoxicity of ZnONPs in studied animals. Also, based on reported results, the M. cartusiana could provide a reliable model to study the impacts of such NMs on non-target organisms. As documented previously in the literature, OXS is the primary mechanism of action for NPs and ultrafine particles. The findings herein showed damage in cell components: organelles and nucleic acids ending in organ dysfunction and/or apoptosis [48,49]. Such modifications in the structural and functional integrity of adjusted biomolecules across the process of OXS of NMs might initiate a range of downstream functional consequences associated with cellular damage and organ dysfunction [50]. The toxicity of ZnONPs is regulated by the released rate of ions in the solution (indirect effect). Ions (Zn²⁺) may be augmented with the increasing concentrations of NMs, where ZnONPs toxicity and bioavailability were controlled by the release of Zn²⁺ [21,51]. Also, ZnONPs might interact with the tissues and organelles (direct effect) [2,52], which were reported in current study.

Genomic alterations

Variations in ISSR-PCR patterns stimulated by chemicals can be interpreted due to differences in the stability of genomic DNA template. The present findings reported different patterns of polymorphism for the six studied primers in the amplification of DNA bands in samples from the treated and recovered snails, either as loss and/or gain [53]. Exposure to ZnONPs could provoke genetic diseases owing to their reported genotoxicity in the current study. Other studies reported similar results on amphibians [54] and fish [18]. Also, other organisms were employed to investigate the genotoxicity of NPs. For example, exposing tadpoles, Pleurodeles waltl, to CeO₂NPs (1 and 10 mg/L) for 12 d showed an increase in micronucleus (MN) [55]. Also, when zebrafish were imperiled by ZnONPs and zinc ions (1–100 mg/L) for 144 h showed modification of gene expression related to oxidizing enzymes and increased DNA damage [12]. Similarly, AgNPs at 55 mg/L induced genomic damage by DNA breaks and OXS in Labeo rohita after 14d exposure [56]. ZnONPs at 0.1, 1.0, and 10 mg/L exhibited DNA damage in tadpoles (Lithobates cutesbeianus) compared to the control group. It was revealed that the 10 mg/L had provoked a high incidence of MNs in erythrocytes and nucleated cells, indicating probable mutagenic and genotoxic consequences of ZnONPs for amphibians [57]. Other studies have also shown that NPs might cause mitochondria damage, DNA adducts, and DNA oxidation [58]. DNA damage was associated with the excessive generation of ROS, which might cause the deterioration of DNA [59]. In parallel, the digestive glands are a vital organ in detoxifying, absorbing, and metabolizing toxicants. Toxicants were carried out via haemolymph to the digestive glands [60]. As a result, it might be useful to utilize this organ to assess biochemical responses to nanomaterials.

Histopathological defects

Snail, H. aspersa exposed to different concentrations of ZnONPs had altered digestive glands through increased secretory cells, vacuolation, and hemocytic infiltration [61]. Also, Ali et al. [62] documented an increase in the excretory cells and flattened digestive glands in AgNPs-treated snail, Eobania vermiculata. Sawasdec et al. [63] reported damage to tubule, vacuoles, enlarged tubule lumen, and destructiveness of digestive glands in copper and lithium-treated snail, Marisa cornuarietis. Moreover, dilation and vacuolation in the crayfish hepatopancreas were induced after exposure to CuONPs [64]. TiO₂NPs caused histopathological differences in the red swamp crayfish organs, where the 25 mg/L dose triggered minor changes in hepatopancreatic tubules, such as the emergence of colored pyknotic nuclei and epithelial cell lysis in certain tubules. However, at high concentrations (250 mg/L) of TiO2NPs, epithelial cells lysed, cellular atrophy occurred, and significant vacuolation occurred [64]. Also, TiO₂NPs caused significant deterioration of the cellular organelles, including ruptured microvilli, distorted mitochondria, vacuolated cytoplasm, pyknotic nuclei, and fragmented endoplasmic reticulum [65]. Therefore, the interaction of NMs with enzymes might cause OXS and the production of ROS, which could lead to cell necrosis [66,67]. ZnONPs initiated histopathological alterations in bivalves' DG and gills of C. aegptiaca [68,69]. The pathological reactions to ZnONPs were cell hypertrophy and hyperplasia; the organs demonstrated gradual alterations in glandular activity. In addition, the lamellae of the gills were uneven, and the filaments were swollen [70].

The measurement of mitochondrial swelling can be explained by the activation of membrane permeability in the amended mitochondria. This discovery involves necrosis or death of apoptotic cells as a function of the involved mitochondria number [71]. Hödl et al. [72] state that these tissues can bind Zn²⁺, and others trigger high levels of metallothioneins. Zinc ions toxicity is intensified, leading to OXS, lipofuscin accumulation, and membrane damage. This result is in accordance with the existing data in the recovered animals, where they could not be completely recovered. Biopersistent potency of ZnONPs displayed this concept through outcome profiles of DNA adducts in the haemolymph and digestive g. and the histopathological defects in sections of digestive glands.

Conclusions

The present findings showed that ZnONPs were bio-persistent in the biological system of snail M. cartusiana, and the treated animals couldn't completely be recovered after 14 d. This was clear in the reported patterns of DNA adducts and histopathological defects data. Such changes may represent the outcome of NMs' stress in organisms. Moreover, the present study showed the utility of land snail M. cartusiana as a bioindicator for NPs toxicity.

Notes

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

CRediT author statement

KYAH: Supervision, Writing-Reviewing & Editing; SRO: Conceplualization, Methodology; AMKN: Conceplualization, Methodology; AK: Data Curation, Writing-Orginal draft Preparation; HMED: Visualization, Investigation.

References

1. Singh A, Mohan Prasad S. Nanotechnology in medical world: a futuristic planning. Int J Sci Res ISSN (Online) 2013. 4(6)2319–7064. https://www.ijsr.net/get_abstract.php?paper_id=SUB155517 .

2. Almansour MI, Alferah MA, Shraideh ZA, Jarrar BM. Zinc oxide nanoparticles hepatotoxicity: histological and histochemical study. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 2017;51:124–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2017.02.015 .

3. Xiong HM. ZnO nanoparticles applied to bioimaging and drug delivery. Adv Mater 2013;25(37):5329–5335. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201301732 .

4. Alkaladi A, El-Deen NAN, Afifi M, Zinadah OAA. Hematological and biochemical investigations on the effect of vitamin E and C on Oreochromis niloticus exposed to zinc oxide nanoparticles. Saudi J Biol Sci 2015;22(5):556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.02.012 .

5. Husen A. Natural product-based fabrication of zinc-oxide nanoparticles and their applications. Nanomaterals and Plant Potential Springer. Cham: 2019. p. 193–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05569-1_7 .

6. Kumar CSSR. Nanotachnologies for the life sciences 51st edth ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VHC; 2006.

7. Mueller NC, Nowack B. Exposure modelling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 2008;42(12):4447–4453. https://doi.org/10.1021/es7029637 .

8. Miranda RR, Damaso da Silveira ALR, de Jesus IP, Grötzner SR, Voigt CL, Campos SX, et al. Effects of realistic concentrations of TiO₂ and ZnO nanoparticles in Prochilodus lineatus juvenile fish. Environ Sci Poll Res 2016;23(6):5179–5188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5732-8 .

9. Adam N, Schmitt C, Galceran J, Companys E, Vakurov A, Wallace R, et al. The chronic toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles and ZnCl₂ to Daphnia magna and the use of different methods to assess nanoparticle aggregation and dissolution. Nanotoxicol 2014;8(7):709–717. https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2013.822594 .

10. Miao AJ, Zhang XY, Luo Z, Chen CS, Chin WC, Santschi PH, et al. Zinc oxide–engineered nanoparticles: dissolution and toxicity to marine phytoplankton. Environ Toxicol Chem 2010;29(12):2814–2822. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.340 .

11. Falfushynska H, Gnatyshyna L, Horyn O, Shulgai A, Stoliar O. A calcium channel blocker nifedipine distorts the effects of nano-zinc oxide on metal metabolism in the marsh frog Pelophylax ridibundus . Saudi J Biol Sci 2019;26(3):481–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.10.004 .

12. Zhao X, Wang S, Wu Y, You H, Lv L. Acute ZnO nanoparticles exposure induces developmental toxicity, oxidative stress and DNA damage in embryo-larval zebrafish. Aquat Toxicol 2013;136:49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2013.03.019 .

13. Da Costa Araújo AP, Gomes AR, Malafaia G. Hepatotoxicity of pristine polyethylene microplastics in neotropical Physalaemus cuvieri tadpoles (Fitzinger, 1826). J Hazard Mater 2020;386:121992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121992 .

14. Vandebriel RJ, De Jong WH. A review of mammalian toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles. Nanotechnol Sci Appl 2012;5:61–71. https://doi.org/10.2147/NSA.S23932 .

15. de Souza JM, de Oliveira Mendes B, Guimarães ATB, de Lima Rodrigues AS, Chagas TQ, Rocha TL, et al. Zinc oxide nanoparticles in predicted environmentally relevant concentrations leading to behavioral impairments in male swiss mice. Sci Total Environ 2018;613:653–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.051 .

16. Abdel-Halim KY, Osman SR, Abdou GY. In vivo evaluation of oxidative stress and biochemical alteration as biomarkers in glass clover snail, Monacha cartusiana exposed to zinc oxide nanoparticles. Environ Poll 2020;257:113120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113120 .

17. Lin D, Xing B. Phytotoxicity of nanoparticles: inhibition of seed germination and root growth. Environ Poll 2007;150(2):243–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.01.016 .

18. Qualhato G, Rocha TL, de Oliveira Lima EC, de Silva DM, Cardoso JR, Grisolia CK, et al. Genotoxic and mutagenic assessment of iron oxide (maghemite-γ-Fe₂O₃) nanoparticle in the guppy Poecilia reticulata . Chemosphere 2017;183:305–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.05.061 .

19. Petros RA, Ropp PA, DeSimone JM. Reductively labile PRINT particles for the delivery of doxorubicin to HeLa cells. J Am Chem Soc 2008;130(5):5008–5009. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja801436j .

20. Dendukuri D, Doyle PS. The synthesis and assembly of polymeric microparticles using microfluidics. Adv Mater 2009;21(41):4071–4086. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200803386 .

21. Ali D, Alarifi S, Kumar S, Ahamed M, Siddiqui MA. Oxidative stress and genotoxic effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles in freshwater snail Lymnaea luteola L. Aquat Toxicol 2012;124–125:83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2012.07.012 .

22. Fahmy SR, Abdel-Ghaffar F, Bakry FA, Sayed DA. Ecotoxocological effect of sublethal exposure to zinc oxide nanoparticles on freshwater Biomphalaria alexandrina . Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 2014;67(2):192–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-014-0020-z .

23. Trevisan R, Delapedra G, Mello DF, Arl M, Schmidt EC, Meder F, et al. Gills are an initial target of zinc oxide nanoparticles in oysters Crassostrea gigas, leading to mitochondrial disruption and oxidative stress. Aquat Toxicol 2014;153:27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2014.03.018 .

24. Mocan T, Clichici S, Agoşton-Coldea L, Mocan L, Şimon Ş, Ilie I, et al. Implications of oxidative stress mechanisms in toxicity of nanoparticles (review). Acta Physiol Hung 2010;97(3):247–255. https://doi.org/10.1556/aphysiol.97.2010.3.1 .

25. Itziou A, Kaloyianni M, Dimitriadis VK. Effects of organic contaminants in reactive oxygen species, protein carbonylation and DNA damage on digestive gland and haemolymph of land snails. Chemosphere 2011;85(6):1101–1107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.07.043 .

26. Taze C, Panetas I, Kalogiannis S, Feidantsis K, Gallios GP, Kastrinaki G, et al. Toxicity assessment and comparison between two types of iron oxide nanoparticles in Mytilus galloprovincialis . Aquat Toxicol 2016;172:9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2015.12.013 .

27. McKelvey-Martin VJ, Green MHL, Schmezer P, Pool-Zobel BL, De Méo MP, Collins A. The single cell gel electrophoresis assay (comet assay): a European review. Mutat Res Fundam Mol Mech Mutagen 1993;288(1):47–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(93)90207-V .

28. Mohanty JG, Bhamidipaty S, Evans MK, Rifkind JM. A fluorimetric semi-microplate format assay of protein carbonyls in blood plasma. Anal Biochem 2010;400(2):289–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2010.01.032 .

29. Kaloyianni M, Feidantsis K, Nteli I, Stergiou P, Tsoulia T, Dimitriadi A, et al. Biochemical and molecular responses of cyprinids in two Mediterranean lacustrine ecosystems: Opportunities for ecological assessment and biomonitoring. Aquat Toxicol 2019;211:105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2019.03.021 .

30. Zhang DX, Gutterman DD. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species-mediated signaling in endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2007;292(5):H2023–H2031. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.01283.2006 .

31. Gomes T, Chora S, Pereira CG, Cardoso C, Bebianno MJ. Proteomic response of mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis exposed to CuO NPs and Cu²⁺: an exploratory biomarker discovery. Aquat Toxicol 2014;155:327–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2014.07.015 .

32. Atienzar FA, Jha AN. The random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) assay and related techniques applied to genotoxicity and carcinogenesis studies: a critical review. Mutat Res 2006;613(2–3):76–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2006.06.001 .

33. Cenkci S, Yildiz M, Cigerci IH, Konuk M, Bozag A. Toxic chemicals-induced gentoxicity detected by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seedlings. Chemosphere 2009;76(7):900–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.05.001 .

34. Kekec G, Sakcali MS, Uzonur I. Assessment of genotoxic effects of Boron on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) by using RAPD analysis. Bull Environ Contamin Toxicol 2010;84(6):759–764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-010-0031-z .

35. Yildirim N, Agar G. Determination of genotoxic effects of fipronil in Vicia faba using random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. Toxicol Ind Health 2016;32(8):1450–1455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748233714564416 .

36. Sarkar A, Bhagat J, Ingole BS, Rao DP, Markad VL. Genotoxicity of cadmium chloride in the marine gastropod Nerita chamaeleon using Comet assay and alkaline unwinding assay. Environ Toxicol 2015;30(2):177–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.21883 .

37. Sarkar A, Bhagat J, Sarker S. Evaluation of impairment of DNA in marine gastropod, Morula granulata as a biomarker of marine pollution. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2014;106:253–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.04.023 .

38. Ali D, Ali H, Alarifi S, Al-Amer A, Kumar PG, Kumar S, et al. Genotoxicity in the freshwater gastropod Lymnaea luteola L: assessment of cell type sensitivities to lead nitrate. Chem Ecol 2017;33(2):171–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/02757540.2016.1275587 .

39. Helmy ET, Ali MA, Ayyad MA, Mohamedbakr HG, Vama RS, Pan JH. Molluscicidal and biochemical effects of green-synthesized F-doped ZnO nanoparticles against land snail Monacha cartusiana under laboratory and field conditions. Environ Poll 2022;308:119691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119691 .

40. Viard B, Maul A, Pihan JC. Standard use conditions of terrestrial gastropods in active biomonitoring of soil contamination. J Environ Monit 2004;6(2):103–107. https://doi.org/10.1039/B307484F .

41. Seow ZLS, Wong ASW, Thavasi V, Jose R, Ranrakrishna S, Ho GW. Controlled synthesis and application of ZnO nanoparticles, nanorods and nanospheres in dye-sensitized solar cells. Nanotechnol 2008;20(4):045604.

42. Kumar A, Sahoo B, Montpetit A, Behera S, Lockey RF, Mohapatra SS. Development of hyaluronic acid-Fe₂O₃ hybrid magnetic nanoparticles for targeted delivery of peptides. Nanomed 2007;3(2):132–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2007.03.001 .

43. Sneath PHA, Sokal RR. Numerical Taxonomy: The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification WF Freeman & Co. San Francisco: 1973. p. 573.

44. Atienzar FA, Conradi M, Evenden AJ, Jha AN, Depledge MH. Qualitative assessment of genotoxicity using random amplified polymorphic DNA: Comparison of genomic templete stability with key fitness parameters in Daphina magna exposed to benzo[a]pyrene. Environ Toxicol Chem 1999;18(10):2275–2282. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620181023 .

45. Reynolds ES. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron opaque stain in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol 1963;17(1):208–212. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.17.1.208 .

46. Cohort Software Inc. Costat User Manual, Version 3 Cohort Tucson. Arizona, USA: 1985.

47. Hotelling H. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. J Educ Psychol 1933;24(6):417–441. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071325 .

48. El-Demerdash FM. Lambda-cyhalothrin-induced changes in oxidative stress biomarkers in rabbit erythrocytes and alleviation effect of some antioxidant. Toxicol In Vitro 2007;21(3):392–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2006.09.019 .

49. Ma H, Diamond SA. Phototoxicity of TiO₂ nanoparticles to zebrafish (Damio rerio) is dependent on life stage. Environ Toxicol Contam 2013;32(9):2139–2143. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2298 .

50. Pamplona R. Membrane phospholipids lipoxidative damage and molecular integrity: a causal role in aging and longevity. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 2008;1777(10):1249–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2008.07.003 .

51. Xiong D, Fang T, Yu L, Sima X, Zhu W. Effects of nano-scale TiO₂, ZnO and their bulk counterparts on zebra fish: acute toxicity, oxidative stress, and oxidative damage. Sci Total Environ 2011;409(8):1444–1452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.01.015 .

52. Siddiqi KS, Husen A. Properties of zinc oxide nanoparticles and their activity against microbes. Nanosci Res Lett 2018;13(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-018-2532-3 .

53. Arya SK, Ghosh I, Banerjee R, Mukherjee A. Malathion and dithane induce DNA damage in Vicia faba . Toxicol Ind Health 2017;33(11):843–854. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748233717726877 .

54. Al Mahrouqi D, Al Riyami S, Barry MJ. Effects of Zn and Ti nanoparticles on the survival and growth of sclerophrys arabica tadpoles in a two level trophic system. Environ Contam Toxicol 2018;101(5):592–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-018-2449-7 .

55. Bour A, Mouchet F, Cadarsi S, Silvestre J, Baqu'e D, Gauthier L, et al. CeO₂ nanoparticle fate in environmental conditions and toxicity on a freshwater predator species: a microcosm study. Environ Sci Poll Res 2017;24(20):17081–17089. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9346-1 .

56. Khan MS, Qureshi NA, Jabeen F. Assessment of toxicity in fresh water fish Labeo rohita treated with silver nanoparticles. Appl Nanosci 2017;7(5):167–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-017-0559-x .

57. Motta AGC, do Amaral DF, Benvindo-Souza M, Rocha TL, e Silva DDM. Genotoxic and mutagenic effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles and zinc chloride on tadpoles of Lithobates catesbeianus (Anura: Ranidae). Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management 2020;14:100356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2020.100356 .

58. Zhang Q, Zhang K, Xu D, Yang G, Huang H, Nie F, et al. CuO nanostructures: Synthesis, characterization, growth mechanisms, fundamental properties, and applications. Prog Mater Sci 2014;60:208–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.09.003 .

59. Ozkan F, Gündüz SG, Berkóz M, Hunt AO, Yalin S. The protective role of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) against chlorpyrifos-induced oxidative stress in Oreochromis niloticus . Fish Phys Biochem 2012;38(3):635–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-011-9544-6 .

60. Regoli F, Gorbi S, Machella N, Tedesco S, Benedetti M, Bocchetti R, et al. Pro-oxidant effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields in the land snail Helix aspersa . Free Radic Biol Med 2005;39(12):1620–1628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2005.08.004 .

61. Abdel-Azeem1 HH, Osman GY. Oxidative stress and histopathological effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on the garden snail Helix aspersa . Environ Sci Poll Res 2021;28(8):9913–9920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11438-z .

62. Ali SM, Yousef NMH, Nafady NA. Application of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles for the control of land snail Eobania vermiculata and some plant pathogenic fungi. J Nanomater 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/218904 .

63. Sawasdee BH, Köhler HR, Triebskorn R. Histopathological effects of copper and lithium in the ramshorn snail, Marisa cornuarietis (Gastropoda, Prosobranchia). Chemosphere 2011;85(6):1033–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.07.030 .

64. El-Atti A, Desouky M, Mohamadien A, Said R. Impact of Copper Oxide Nanoparticles on freshwater crayfish, Procambarus clarkia. A combined histopathological, Biochemical and genotoxicological study. Journal of Egyptian Academic Society for Environmental Development D, Environmental Studies 2019;20(1):1–18.

65. Roncero V, Duran E, Soler F, Masot J, Gomez L. Morphometric structural and ultrastructural studies of tench (Tinca tinca L.) hepatocytes after copper sulphate administration. Environ Res 1992;57(1):45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-9351(05)80018-0 .

66. Chio CP, Chen WY, Chou WC, Hsieh NH, Ling MP, Liao CM. Assessing the potential risks to zebrafish posed by environmentally relevant copper and silver nanoparticles. Sci Total Environ 2012;420:111–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.01.023 .

67. Braunbeck T, Burkhardt-Holm P, Storch V. Liver pathology in eels (Anguilla anguilla) from Rhine River exposed to the chemical spill at Basle in November 1986. Limnologie ak1ucll 1990;

68. Koehler A, Marx U, Broeg K, et al. Effects of nanoparticles in Mytilus edulis gills and hepatopancreas-a new threat to marine life. Mar Environ Res 2008;66(1):12–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2008.02.009 .

69. Hu S, Han J, Yang L, Li S, Guo Y, Zhou B, et al. Impact of co-exposure to titanium dioxide nanoparticles and Pb on zebrafish embryos. Chemosphere 2019;233:579–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.009 .

70. Fahmy SR, Sayed DA. Toxicological perturbations of zinc oxide nanoparticles in the Coelatura aegyptiaca mussel. Toxicol Ind Health 2017;33(7):564–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748233716687927 .

71. Salmi A, Rouabhi R, Toualbia N, Taib C, Chenikher H, Gasmi S, et al. Subcellular study of the cadmium selenide nanoparticles (CdSe-NPs) toxicity on a terrestrial bioindicator model Helix aspersa . Toxicol Environ Healh Sci 2017;9(2):135–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13530-017-0314-4 .

72. Hödl E, Felder E, Chabicovsky M, Dallinger R. Cadmium stress stimulates tissue turnover in Helix pomatia: increasing cell proliferation from metal tolerance to exhaustion in molluscan midgut gland. Cell Tissue Res 2010;341(1):159–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-010-0980-x .

Article information Continued

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Primer	Primer sequence (5′-3′)	Annealing temperature (°C)
HB-09	GTGTGTGTGTGTGG	53
HB-12	CACCACCACGC	55
HB-14	GTGTGTGTGTGTGC	57
UBC811	GAGAGAGAGAGAGAGC	57
UBC868	GAAGAAGAAGAAGAAGAA	51
UBC840	GAGAGAGAGAGAGAGATT	55