Neuroprotection by Nauclea latifolia extract in arsenite & high-fat diet-induced brain stress
Article information
Abstract
Sodium arsenite (NaAsO2) and high fat diet (HFD) are already documented to provoke oxidative stress, neuro inflammation and learning and memory deficits. This work aimed to determine the possible neuroprotection of the root extract of Nauclea latifolia (NlREq) against NaAsO2/HFD induced neurotoxicity in Wistar rats. Twenty-five rats were divided into five groups: groups include control; NaAsO2/HFD treated; NaAsO2/HFD + NlREq at 200 mg /kg and 400 mg/kg; and NaAsO2/HFD treated with silymar in at the dose of 50 mg/kg. The behavioral assessments (elevated plus maze and T-maze), biochemical analysis and histological investigations were performed. As shown in the present study, NaAsO2/HFD group exhibited enhanced anxiety related behaviour, memory deficit, oxidative stress (MDA, TNF-α, IL-1β) and decreased antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, GSH) activity. The histological examination revealed significant neuronal loss and remarkable architectural alteration in hippocampus, prefrontal cortex and cerebellum. These effects were ameliorated by NlREq administered in a dose-dependent manner, with the 400 mg/kg dose enhancing memory in the affected animals, reducing inflammation, replenishing antioxidant defence systems, and maintaining integrity of neurons. These results indicate that Nauclea latifolia root extract has strong neuroprotective potential and may be used as a phytochemical for managing neurotoxicity and cognitive impairment due to exposure to toxins in the environment and poor diet.
Introduction
Public health faces rising challenges from widespread high-fat diet (HFD) use coupled with arsenic toxin exposure because these factors both speed up the development of metabolic disorders and cardiovascular diseases and now demonstrate increased potential to cause neurotoxicity [1]. Studies demonstrate that combined exposure to HFD and arsenic compounds aggravates adverse medical outcomes resulting in evident physiological abnormalities including cognitive impairment. The simultaneous exposure to HFD and arsenic causes synergistic effects which generate intensified neurological deficits and memory impairment according to Alboghobeish et al. [2] and Ashraf et al. [3]. Studies have proven that exposure to both agents in unison results in neurotoxic damage that exceeds results from single-agent exposure by threefold [2]. Oxidative stress has augmented through exposure while information from brain antioxidant defense mechanisms has diminished. Many studies have demonstrated that arsenic exposure could potentially have opposite anti-obesity outcomes to dietary fat consumption while modifying neurotoxicity effects [4].
The environmental pollutant NaAsO₂ generates major neurological damage and impaired mental functions [5]. Repeated absorption of arsenic by the brain leads to concentration-dependent accumulation, initially affecting the hippocampus before spreading to the cerebellum and ultimately the cerebrum [3]. Research shows that the spatial memory process along with learning ability become impaired as a result of these changes observed in hippocampal neurons [6,7]. Stimulated by NaAsO₂ the activation of MMP-2 and MMP-9 degrades the blood-brain barrier (BBB) thus permitting toxic compounds to enter the brain which results in multiple forms of brain damage and dementia development [5]. The compound causes oxidative stress through its action of lowering antioxidants and boosting lipid damage which activates inflammatory pathways NF-κB and Nrf2 thus accelerating neurodegeneration [8]. The neuronal function becomes impaired because of diminished norepinephrine, dopamine and acetylcholinesterase activity [9]. Evidence shows that HFD create adverse effects on brain function through the mechanisms of neuroinflammation combined with hippocampal microRNA alterations and diminished neuroplasticity as well as cognitive impairment [10]. HFD causes dissipation of BBB integrity while producing sex-dependent modifications of neuronal firing and it leads to cognitive plus motor dysfunction [11, 12]. Neurotoxic effects trigger by a combination of High-fat diet and NaAsO₂ impact memory and cognitive function severely along with generating oxidative stress and creating mitochondrial dysfunction [13, 14]. This highlights the need for effective protective strategies against such combined toxicities.
The medicinal plant N. latifolia which goes by its common name African peach stands out for its traditional medical applications and therapeutic abilities. This plant serves multiple cultural purposes for the treatment of diabetes and hypertension and inflammatory diseases [15,16]. The plant extracts demonstrate strong antioxidant capabilities and anti-inflammatory effects that establish it as a useful natural medicine component. African peach received traditional approval for treating diabetes patients alongside those dealing with malaria and hypertension problems [15, 17]. The presence of flavonoids, phenolics, and saponins provides antioxidant properties to the plant [18].
Given the serious health risks linked to combined exposure to a HFD and NaAsO₂, there’s a growing need for effective protective agents that can help counter these harmful effects. N. latifolia, a plant long valued in traditional medicine, has shown promising antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. However, its potential to combat the combined impact of a HFD and NaAsO₂ exposure remains largely unexplored. This study aimed to evaluate whether the root extract of N. latifolia could protect against HFD/NaAsO₂-induced anxiety, memory impairment, oxidative stress, elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β), and brain regions (hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and cerebellum) tissue damage in rats. We hypothesized that the extract would significantly reduce these toxic effects, via its antioxidant and cell-protective actions.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals and reagents
The chemicals used were NaAsO2, ketamine hydrochloride (PVT Ltd., India,) rat loading activities of the antioxidant enzymes (CAT, SOD, GSH), concentration of MDA, and chemokines (TNF-alpha and IL-1ꞵ rat ELISA kit). The silymarin used in this study was silymarin capsules 70 mg/tablet, purchased from the Micro Labs Ltd, India. All other chemicals and reagents used in the studies were of analytical grade and obtained from standard commercial sources.
Plant collection, identification and extraction
N. latifolia root extracts were collected from a community garden in Shika, Sabo, Kaduna State, Nigeria immediately after the flowering period. Characterization and authentication of the plant root was done by a Taxonomist of Ahmadu Bello University. The voucher specimen number for the plant is 3276, which is deposited in the herbarium of the department. Air-drying of N. latifolia roots was done at 25 °C until they reached a constant mass and then mechanically pounded using an automated mortar and pestle. Subsequently, each dry powder of the sample was dissolved in 600 ml of 95% ethanol and maintained at the same condition for 48 hours. The tested samples, weighing 500 g, were put into the mortar. The samples were filtered through Whatman filter paper no. 1 and then concentrated at 55 °C using rotary evaporator namely Rotavapor R-300, Buchi. The extract was stored on ice and at a temperature of 4 °C was used in this experiment. The rats under experimentation were administered with N. latifolia extract in a daily dose in distilled water.
Experimental animals and ethical compliance
The rats used in this experimental study were 25 healthy six-week-old Wistar albino rats with body weight of 140 to 160g. When housed in these chambers it is important to note that the rats were caged in clear plastic cages with a mesh roof and provisions for the feeding and watering of the animals. The rats were maintained under standard housing condition, temperature of 25 ± 2 °C and light-dark cycle of 12 hours in a vermiculated portion of the animal house of the faculty of pharmaceutical science, ABU, Zaria, Nigeria. The rats also received standard rodent diet and water ad libitum in good hygienic conditions as needed by any standard rodent. These rats were allowed to acclimatized for two weeks before the experiment. The follow-up of the study was enhanced with the permit of the ethic committee of the utilisation of animals in the process of ABU Zaria Animal Use and Care Committee (ABUCAUC/2023/033). All animal studies were carried out in compliance with the European Union guidelines for the use of animals for scientific research (Directive 2010/63/ EU).
Experimental design and treatment groups
Twenty-five (25) rats were randomly assigned into five groups of 5 rats each as follows:
Group 1 (normal control) included rats receiving distilled water (10 ml/kg b.w.);
Group 2 (positive control) treated with HFD/ NaAsO₂ rats);
Group 3 rats treated with HFD/NaAsO2 + N. latifolia roots extract – NlREq (200 mg/kg b.w.);
Group 4 rats treated with HFD/NaAsO2 + N. latifolia roots extract – NlREq (400 mg/kg b.w.);
Group 5 rats treated with HFD/NaAsO2 + Silymarin (50 mg/kg b.w.);
The high-fat diet (consisting of 40 grams of animal fat and 100 grams of pelletised rat chow), and drinking water containing NaAsO2 was supplied (prepared from sodium arenite solution in deionized water to a final concentration of 10 mg/L). The doses of both HFD and NaAsO₂ were selected based on previous studies, which demonstrated their ability to induce organ toxicity in Wistar rats [19, 20]. The selection of N. latifolia at doses of 200 mg/kg and 400 mg/kg was informed by previous studies demonstrating its therapeutic efficacy and favourable safety profile. These doses have been shown to exert significant biological activity without inducing adverse effects on hepatic or renal function, thus supporting their suitability for use in this study [21,22].
Behavioural tests
A blinded investigator assessed behavioural abnormalities. Neurobehavioral tests (using Elevated plus maze and T-maze test) were conducted in a well-lit testing room and recorded using a digital video recorder. The recordings were analyzed with ANY-maze video tracking software (Kim & Friends Inc., USA), and the data were exported to excel for further evaluation [23].
Elevated plus maze
The EPM test is to evaluate anxiety-like behaviors in rats based on their preference for using an open field test [24,25]. The EPM for rats had two perpendicular open arms of size 21.5 × 7.5 cm and two closed ones 21.5 × 7.5 × 20 cm which were arranged from a central square platform of 7.5 × 7.5 cm. The platform, as well as the floored area of the maze, was made from wooden material; the lateral walls of the closed arms were made of wooden panels painted black. The whole maze was above the ground surface by a mean height of 38 cm [26].
In the course of each trial, one rat at a time was then put at the centre of the maze and the exploratory activities of the rat were tracked for five minutes. Some of the variables quantified included the totals of entries made into the open and closed arms as well as the amount of time spent in the open or closed arms. Data collected from rat activities was omitted for the time spent on the central platform. To avoid other scent clues affecting the subsequent experiments, the maze was washed with 70% ethanol and left to air dry in between trials.
T-maze spontaneous alternation
This experiment employed a T-maze apparatus made from black plexiglass to minimise any prospective fresh stimuli during the experiment. This included a long start arm with a width of 16 cm and length of 50 cm and two choice arms each with width of 10 cm and length of 10 cm located perpendicularly on the upper end of the start arm. A partition projected 15 cm from the start arm and forced the rat into one of the left or right goal arm without its reach the junction. A rat was taken separately and placed in the start arm, facing the junction, and the rat was trained to choose the appropriate arm – left or right. A correct alternation was defined as a time when the rat switched between goal arms, an incorrect choice was considered an error. An arm choice was recorded only if all four legs of the rat was placed in it. Every rat was given seven trials with 30 second intertrial interval; the maximum switch between the left and right arms were six as recommended by Jagadeesan et al. [27].
Biochemical studies
Wistar rat brain tissues were removed and prepared according to procedures elaborated by Zatta et al. [28] and Habila et al. [29]. Following anaesthesia, the treated and control animals were sacrificed by decapitation immediately after sample collection. Then, the brain tissues were immediately dissected out and dropped on an inverted Petri dish which rested on ice. These tissues were stripped and washed in physiological saline and then homogenized in PBS solution 0.7, pH 7:4. In order to pellet the cellular debris from the homogenized samples, they were further centrifuged at 5,000 X g for 15 minutes, and the resultant supernatant was aliquoted and kept at -20 °C for subsequent antioxidant (SOD, CAT, GSH and MDA) and Inflammatory (TNF-α and IL1-β) analysis.
Activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD)
SOD activity was measured following the methodology outlined by Kakkar et al. [30]. The assay involved a reaction mixture containing 2 mL of 0.052 mM sodium pyrophosphate buffer (pH 8.0), 0.1 mL of 186 μM phenazine methosulfate, 0.3 mL of brain supernatant, and 0.1 mL of 300 μM nitro blue tetrazolium. The mixture was subsequently incubated at 37°C for 5 minutes, after which 0.2 mL of NADH (780 μM) was introduced into the solution. The reaction was then allowed to proceed for 2 minutes at 37°C and stopped by the addition of 1.0 mL of glacial acetic acid (17.4 mol/L). The enzymatic activity of the resulting-coloured product was determined at 560 nm against reagent blank using spectrophotometer, model UV-2100, (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan),and reported as units (U) protein-1.
Determination of catalase activity (CAT)
CAT activity was assessed using a modified version of the Aebi, [31] method. The reaction mixture consisted of 2.5 mL of 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 0.4 mL of 5.9 mM hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), and 0.1 mL of enzyme extract. The activity was evaluated by monitoring the reduction in absorbance at 240 nM using spectrophotometer, model UV-2100, (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan), with results expressed as units per milligram of protein.
Glutathione peroxide (GSH) technique
Using Paglia and Valentine's [32] method, the activity of GSH was measured. The reaction mixture was prepared using 0.1 mL of 0.15 M reduced glutathione (GSH), 0.3 mL of 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 0.05 mL of 2.25 mM sodium azide, 0.2 mL of 0.85 mM NADPH, 0.05 mL of brain homogenate, and 0.05 mL of water. The mixture was placed on a vortex for 10 minutes Per sample. The experiment was kept at room temperature. To start the enzymatic reaction, 0.05 mL of hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂, 0.0011 M) were added and the absorbance read at 340 nm for 3 minutesusing spectrophotometer, model UV-2100, (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). The data obtained for a particular enzyme was reported relative to milligrams of the extracted protein.
Lipid peroxidation by measuring the malondialdehyde (MDA) level
Oxidative stress was determined by estimating malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration, according to the method described by Ohkawa et al. [33]. Shortly, 1.5 mL acetic acid 20%, 0.2 mL sodium dodecyl sulfate 8.1%, 1.5 mL thiobarbituric acid 0.8% was mixed with 0.1 mL brain tissue. They added the mixture to heat at 100°C for one hour and finally cooled in running tap water. On cooling, distilled water 1.0 mL and 5.0 mL of n-butanol containing pyridine were also added. The mixture was centrifuged for 10 minutes at 4000 rpm and 4°C then the pink colored compound in the supernatant was carefully extracted for absorption measurement at 532 nm using spectrophotometer, model UV-2100, (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan).
Determination of inflammatory markers
Concentrations of TNF-α and IL1-β (inflammatory cytokines) in the samples were estimated using ELISA kits from Ray Biotech, Inc. USA. In this study, we quantified the cytokines in the blood serum in pg/ml in this study.
Histological studies
The brain was dissected out, the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus cerebellum was carefully excised, tissue was post-fixed in Neutral buffer formalin for 24 hours then processed for histological staining with H&E to demonstrate cortical histoarchitectural changes [34].
Statistical analysis
The data obtained in these investigations was analyse with help of the SPSS software, version 20, produced by IBM, USA. The statistical analysis was done using a one-way ANOVA and then Tukey post hoc test to ascertain the difference in control group and experimental groups. The results obtained were presented as means ± standard error of the mean wherever applicable. The measure of significance was at p < 0.05.
Results
Effects of N. latifolia on the gross morphology of HFD/NaAsO₂ exposed rats
Table 1, At the onset of the study, there was no statistically significant different (p > 0.05) in the weight of the Wistar rats across and within the experimental groups. At the end the experiment, HFD/NaAsO2 exposure resulted in a substantial body weight loss (p < 0.05) in all rats treated with HFD/NaAsO2 alone compared to rats in the treatment groups receiving 400 mg/kg NlREq + HFD/NaAsO2 and 50 mg/kg SLY + HFD/NaAsO2. Altogether, body weight gain in HFD/NaAsO2 treated rats was considerably (p < 0.05) less compared with control group and 400 mg/kg NlREq + HFD/NaAsO2 treated rats. The change in body weight which was measured in percentage (%) was significantly low in the HFD/NaAsO2 treated group compared to groups of rats that were treated with 400 mg/kg NlREq + HFD/NaAsO2.
N. latifolia ameliorates anxiety-like behaviour in HFD/NaAsO₂-exposed rats
The data presented in Table 2 demonstrate significant differences across all groups regarding the number of closed and open arm entries by the rats. Similar patterns were observed in the percentage of entries into the closed and open arms and in the index of open arm avoidance. When compared to the control group, rats treated with HFD/NaAsO₂ exhibited reduced time spent in the open arms and increased time in the closed arms, accompanied by a significantly higher number of entries into the closed arms and fewer entries into the open arms.
Conversely, rats treated with 200/400 mg/kg NlREq + HFD/NaAsO₂ exhibited a significant, dose-dependent increase in the time spent in the open arms and a corresponding decrease in the time spent in the closed arms compared to the HFD/NaAsO₂-treated group. Furthermore, the index of open arm avoidance (%) was significantly reduced in HFD/NaAsO₂-treated rats compared to both the control group and the treatment groups (200/400 mg/kg NlREq + HFD/NaAsO₂ and 50 mg/kg SLY + HFD/NaAsO₂).
Estimation of spontaneous alternation (%)
The statistical analysis of the mean values of spontaneous alternation is presented in Fig. 1. Rats treated with HFD/NaAsO₂ exhibited a significant reduction (p < 0.05) in spontaneous alternation, with a mean value of 43.41 ± 1.39, compared to the control group, which had a mean value of 71.46 ± 2.61. Treatment with 200 mg/kg and 400 mg/kg NlREq + HFD/NaAsO₂ resulted in mean values of 61.35 ± 1.54 and 68.72 ± 1.56, respectively, showing a significant (p < 0.05) increase in the percentage of spontaneous alternation compared to the HFD/NaAsO₂-treated group. Similarly, the 50 mg/kg SLY + HFD/NaAsO₂ treatment group demonstrated a significant improvement in spontaneous alternation compared to the HFD/NaAsO₂-treated group.
Effect of N. latifolia root on oxidative stress markers of HFD/NaAsO₂ exposed rats
The mean levels of oxidative stress biomarkers—SOD (4.10 ± 0.24), CAT (4.20 ± 0.22), and GSH (12.74 ± 1.18)—were significantly lower in the HFD/NaAsO₂-treated group compared to the control group, which showed mean levels of 15.38 ± 0.48 for SOD, 10.60 ± 0.58 for CAT, and 34.72 ± 1.73 for GSH, respectively. Rats treated with 400 mg/kg NlREq + HFD/NaAsO₂ showed a significant increase in SOD (9.42 ± 0.98), CAT (8.20 ± 0.26), and GSH (21.92 ± 1.46) levels compared to those treated only with HFD/NaAsO₂. Similarly, the 200/400 mg/kg NlREq + HFD/NaAsO₂ and 50 mg/kg SLY + HFD/NaAsO₂-treated groups demonstrated significantly elevated CAT and GSH levels relative to the HFD/NaAsO₂ group. However, no significant differences in SOD levels were observed between the 200/400 mg/kg NlREq + HFD/NaAsO₂ and 50 mg/kg SLY + HFD/NaAsO₂-treated groups when compared with the HFD/NaAsO₂ group.
Additionally, the MDA levels in the HFD/NaAsO₂-treated rats (196.20 ± 3.59) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those in the control group (148.60 ± 4.56). Treatment with 200 mg/kg and 400 mg/kg NlREq + HFD/NaAsO₂ resulted in a dose-dependent significant reduction in MDA levels, with values of 179.34 ± 2.85 and 156.80 ± 1.83, respectively, compared to the HFD/NaAsO₂-treated group. Similarly, rats treated with 50 mg/kg SLY + HFD/NaAsO₂ exhibited a significant decrease in MDA levels relative to the HFD/NaAsO₂-treated group (Fig. 2).
Effects of N. latifolia root on inflammatory markers of HFD/NaAsO₂ exposed rats
The statistical analysis of the mean values for oxidative stress biomarkers is presented in Fig. 3. Rats exposed to HFD/NaAsO₂ showed significant increases (p < 0.05) in TNF-α and IL-1β levels, with mean values of 91.21 ± 1.67 and 74.81 ± 2.46, respectively, compared to the control group, which had corresponding mean levels of 41.60 ± 2.06 and 40.73 ± 1.28. Treatment with 200 or 400 mg/kg NlREq in combination with HFD/NaAsO₂ significantly reduced TNF-α levels to 53.06 ± 4.00 and 51.64 ± 4.57, and IL-1β levels to 61.59 ± 5.19 and 62.23 ± 5.11, respectively, compared to the untreated HFD/NaAsO₂ group. Similarly, rats treated with 50 mg/kg SLY + HFD/NaAsO₂ showed a significant reduction in TNF-α and IL-1β levels, with values of 152.00 ± 2.66 and 182.80 ± 8.55, respectively, when compared to the HFD/NaAsO₂ group.
Histological evaluation
According to histological changes, there were noticeable tissue changes in all groups of the experiment. In the control group the areas of interest showed hippocampus had normal architecture with well developed granular and pyramidal neurons in CA1 and CA3 regions as depicted in the Figure 4A. In contrast, rats placed on HFD/NaAsO₂ developed significant neuronal pathology in terms of shrunken nuclei, vacuolated cytoplasm or pyknotic nuclei or karyolysis in the CA1 region of the hippocampus. Further, areas devoid of pyramidal neurons were noted; and apoptosis in of pyramidal cells of the CA3 region were detected (blue arrow), and clumped neuronal fibrils (arrow) were also noticeable (Fig. 4B). Treatments with 200 mg/kg NlREq + HFD/NaAsO₂ led to mild damage on the granular cells in the CA1 area and the pyramidal cells in the CA3 area with intracellular vacuoles with more intense staining as shown in Fig. 4C. However, the group given 400 mg/kg NlREq+ HFD/NaAsO₂ exhibited near-normal structure or architecture of the brain plus nearly normal histology or arrangement of cells; with only a few pyramidal as well as granule cells remained vacuolated in both the CA1 and CA3 areas of the hippocampus (Fig. 4D). Supplementation with 50 mg/kg SLY along with HFD/NaAsO₂ induced relatively mild neurotoxicity characterized by degeneration of the granular and pyramidal cells as well as vacuolation in the CA1 and CA3 regions of the hippocampus.
Composite photomicrographs of the hippocampus: Control group (A) was observed with packed layers of CA1 pyramidal cell with vesicular nucleus and standardized CA3 neurons each with central nucleolus and vesicular nucleus (arrow). The HFD/NaAsO2-treated (B) group also has shrunken nuclei, vacuolated cytoplasm, and neuronal loss in CA1 and apoptosis together with fibril clumping in CA3 (arrow). The CA1 and CA3 of extract treated groups (C&D) (200/400 mg/kg NlREq + HFD/NaAsO2) showed preservation of the pyramidal cells although with vacuolated pyramidal and granular cells were observed (arrow). The 50 mg/kg SLY + HFD/NaAsO2 group (E) shows slighted necrotic pyramidal cells and granular cells at CA1 &CA3 (arrow) (H&E X 200).
The control group exhibited intact neurons and a normal cytoarchitecture in the prefrontal cortex and cerebellum (Fig. 5A), including well-preserved molecular, granular, and Purkinje cell layers (Fig. 6A).
Representative photomicrographs of the prefrontal cortex. The control section (A) shows darkly pigmented neurons and an intact neuropil, indicating normal cortical architecture (green arrow). In the HFD/NaAsO₂-treated group (B), there is evidence of severe vacuolations, necrosis of neurons, and the presence of pericellular spaces surrounding necrotic and pyknotic neurons(red arrow). Treatment with 200/400 mg/kg of NlREq + HFD/NaAsO₂ (C & D) resulted in only mild vacuolations and preserved pyramidal and granular neuronal cells(green arrow). Similarly, the group treated with 50 mg/kg SLY + HFD + NaAsO₂ (E) showed a few vacuolated neurons with moderate degenerative changes(green arrow) (H&E stain, X200).
Representative photomicrographs of the cerebellum. In the control section (A), the cerebellum displays a well-organized structure with intact molecular, granular, and Purkinje cell layers, along with healthy Purkinje cells (green arrow). In contrast, the HFD/NaAsO₂-treated group (B) shows degeneration of the Purkinje cells and disorganization of their layer (red arrow). Groups treated with 200/400 mg/kg of NlREq + HFD/NaAsO₂ (C & D) showed near-normal cerebellar layering and only mild alterations (green arrow). The SLY-treated group (E) exhibited some degenerative changes in the Purkinje cells and their layer (green arrow). (H&E stain, X200)
In contrast, the HFD/NaAsO₂ group had pronounced neuronal inflammation and loss of the neurons’cell, and most of the neurons were surrounded by widening of the perineuronal spaces (Fig. 5B), while for the cerebellum there is degeneration of the Purkinje cells (Fig. 6B). The rats, receiving 200/400 mg/kg NlREq, demonstrated neuronal preservation with multiple regenerated neurons and the decrease level of neuropil vacuolation(Fig. 5C&D), while for histology of the cerebellum revealed near normalorientation of the molecular layer, granular layer, and purkinje layer pyramidal and granule cells (Fig. 6C&D). The rats in the group receiving SLY of the 50 mg/kg backed up with HFD/ NaAsO₂ showed close to normal and crowded granular neuronal (Fig. 5E) cells and cerebellum densely populated granular layer, normal molecular layer and slight degeneration of the purkinje layer and cells (Fig 6E).
Discussion
The interplay between NaAsO2 exposure and high-fat diets significantly influences body weight regulation and metabolic health. This study found that rats given NaAsO2/HFD compared to controls, body weight gain dropped significantly (p < 0.05). Previous research indicates that HFD can disrupt energy homeostasis, leading to decreased body weight [35]. On the other hand, rats treated with 200 and 400 mg/kg with N. latifolia were able to prevent the HFD/NaAsO2-induced adverse effects. N. latifolia mitigates weight loss in rats by eliciting recovery effects, as evidenced by a significant increase in body weight. The observed outcome was in agreement with the previous works done. N. latifolia has demonstrated potential in mitigating weight loss in rats through various mechanisms, particularly in the context of obesity and metabolic disorders. The studies indicate that extracts from this plant can influence body weight and lipid profiles, contributing to weight management without suppressing appetite [36,37].
In the study HFD/NaAsO2 exposure have been shown to induce anxiety-like behaviours also impaired memory function in rats treated with HFD/ NaAsO2 as observed in the result section (Fig.1 & Table 2). HFD are associated with changes in the gut microbiome, neuroinflammation, and alterations in brain signalling pathways, all of which contribute to increased anxiety [38, 39]. Likewise, NaAsO2, is known to induce oxidative stress as also observed in this study, which can similarly affect brain function and behaviour [40, 41]. The interplay between HFD and NaAsO2 exposure significantly impaired memory function, primarily through oxidative stress and neuroinflammatory pathways. Studies show that each of them reduces cognition individually and collectively, especially in the hippocampus, which is the part of the brain that deals with memory. Highrate of HFD consumption causes cognitive deterioration characterized by poor memory in rats after numerous days of a high fat diet accompanied by high IL-1β levels in the hippocampus[42]. Collectively, we reveal an HFD-induced alteration of synaptic plasticity and tau hyperphosphorylation, resulting in deficits in learning and memory [43]. NaAsO2 exposure induces oxidative stress, leading to spatial learning and memory impairments in rats [12, 44]. Chronic arsenic exposure alters hippocampal neuron structure and function, correlating with memory deficits observed in behavioural tests. The simultaneous exposure to HFD and NaAsO2 amplifies memory impairment, with studies showing that their combined effects are more detrimental than either factor alone [2].This experiment further demonstrated that N. latifolia improve memory function and mitigating anxiety level in rats’ model as shown in the result particularly the high dose (400 mg/kg), as revealed by the percentage of spontaneous alternation of rats in treated group in comparison to rats who received only NaAsO2 alone. This might be as a result of the antioxidant potential of the N. latifolia, and this finding is consistent with the previous experiment.
NaAsO2 exposure leads to increased ROS production, which is linked to cognitive deficits and neurotoxicity. Studies show that arsenite treatment elevates lipid peroxidation and depletes antioxidant defenses, such as glutathione [44,45]. Chronic arsenic exposure disrupts mitochondrial function, decreasing the activity of key mitochondrial complexes and superoxide dismutase (MnSOD), resulting in further ROS accumulation [46]. High-fat diets can also exacerbate oxidative stress by increasing lipid peroxidation, which, when combined with arsenic exposure, may lead to synergistic neurotoxic effects [44]. In this study, N. latifolia stem-bark extract increases concentration of reduced glutathione and antioxidant enzymes notably. This finding affirms the earlier studies that N. latifolia extracts contain a high total antioxidant capacity with efficient DPPH scavenging and FRAP, revealing that plants could help combat free radicals [18]. Besides, the fact that N. latifolia contains phytochemicals such as flavonoids Saponins, alkaloids, vitamins C and E and phenolics also supports antioxidant properties of the brain [18].
In this study, NaAsO₂ combined with HFD in rats increased inflammation by upregulating pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-1β, thereby exacerbating oxidative stress and inducing neural cell necrosis, as further confirmed by brain histological analysis. NaAsO2, an environmental toxicant, increase inflammatory responses [47, 48]. On the other hand, HFD incites chronic low-grade inflammation that activates pathways leading to neuroinflammation and the related cognitive decline by the C/EBPβ/AEP signalling [49]. In this study, N. latifolia was able to prevent the upsurge of the inflammation and it also prevent the cytoarchitecture of the histology of the brain (Cerebrum, cerebellum and Hippocampus), and this in line with other works where, N. latifolia have been shown to exhibits significant anti-inflammatory mechanisms primarily through its phytochemical constituents, which include flavonoids, phenolics, glycosides, and tannins. These phytochemicals also play a role in the anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting pro-inflammatory pathways [17]. The plant is traditionally used to treat various ailments, including those associated with inflammation, suggesting its potential as a natural therapeutic agent [50].
Conclusions
The present investigation showed that aqueous root extract of N. latifolia reversed neurotoxicity and oxidative stress caused by NaAsO₂ and HFD in the Wistar rats. The extract added better behavioural performance, replenished antioxidant protection, lowered pro-inflammatory cytokines and provided structural protection to neurons which are the highest at increased doses. The results presented here affirm the viability of the N. latifolia for reducing neurotoxicity due to environmental toxins and unhealthy diet by modulating oxidative stress and neuro inflammation. However, more research must be done to understand how the compound operates at the molecular level and how it may be used in practice.
Notes
Acknowledgement
Mr. Bamidele, Senior Medical Laboratory Scientist, Department of Human Anatomy, ABU, Zaria, deserves a special mention for his efforts in performing the biochemical assay and processing the tissue samples.
Conflict of interest
There was no funding from public, commercial, or not-for-profit bodies for this project.
CRediT author statement
WM: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Writing – Original draft, Writing – Review & Editing; AA: Methodology, Funding acquisition, Writing – Review & Editing; OBO: Methodology, Investigation, Writing – Original draft; JTA: Methodology, Investigation; GKA: Project administration, Supervision; VKJ: Writing – Original draft, Writing – Review & Editing; AYS: Investigation, Writing – Original draft; BI: Funding acquisition, Writing – Review & Editing.
Funding
There was no funding from public, commercial, or not-for-profit bodies for this project
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The authors confirm that all animals were provided humane care during the experimental period, in compliance with the guidelines set by the Directorate of Academic Planning and Monitoring, ABU, Zaria, and the approved recommendations for laboratory animal care and use (ABUCAUC/2023/033).
Availability of data and material
The datasets utilized and/or examined in this study can be obtained from Wusa Makena or the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Consent for publication
Not applicable
