| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |  
top_img
Environ Anal Health Toxicol > Volume 40:2025 > Article
Issa and Mohammed: A critical review on the journey of benzoic acid in the pharmaceutical industry from manufacturing processes through various uses to disposal: An environmental perspective

Abstract

This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of benzoic acid (BA) as a preservative and additive with a particular focus on its utilization in the pharmaceutical sector, its lifespan, and its environmental impact. The key aspects of this review offer significant additional perspectives on the relevant subject matter. The review suggests a thorough and organized analysis, likely incorporating multiple studies and sources, to provide a complete understanding of the subject. It suggests an in-depth study of BA's involvement and evolution in the pharmaceutical sector, spanning from the early stages of production to the final phases. It highlights the long-standing use of BA in pharmaceuticals, despite its associated toxicity issues. The review emphasizes its role as a versatile compound in the synthesis of more complex medicinal products, such as benzoyl peroxide. The review provides a lifecycle analysis through a comprehensive exploration of BA's lifecycle, from manufacturing processes to its various applications and eventual disposal. This involves evaluating its environmental consequences and emphasizing the significance of sustainability in its utilization. In terms of environmental considerations, the review offers a critical evaluation of how BA affects the environment; under certain conditions, it can form other compounds that become persistent organic pollutants. The review aims to provide insights and make a significant contribution to understanding the implications of BA in pharmaceuticals and its environmental footprint. Therefore, this study provides a comprehensive assessment that not only addresses the scientific and treatment aspects of BA but also evaluates the larger environmental consequences, making it relevant to ecology and environment experts.

Introduction

Benzoic acid (BA) is a simple aromatic carboxylic acid. Despite its primary classification as a food additive, preservative, and flavoring agent [1], the pharmaceutical industry extensively utilizes benzoic acid (BA), the subject of our current study, as a preservative. Because of its versatility, BA is commonly used in pharmaceutical products and medication formulations, ensuring the stability of medications by preventing microbial contamination [2,3]. Its antibacterial characteristics make it a useful preservative, contributing to the maintaining of product stability and the extension of shelf life [4, 5]. There are controlled-release formulations that can benefit from its pH-dependent solubility, as it is a weak acid with a negative log of the acid dissociation constant (pKa) of 4.2 [6,7]. Oral liquids, topical treatments, and even some parenteral medications include BA or its derivatives like sodium benzoate [8 9]. It has a long history of use in pharmaceutical applications, despite toxicity-related issues [10]. Moreover, BA facilitates the production of more complex medicinal compounds [11]. It serves as an intermediate in the synthesis of various medicinal compounds, including benzoyl peroxide, which is a widely used acne treatment [12-14].
BA is also utilized in medicines for its antifungal properties. Topical formulations containing this substance are commonly used to treat skin infections, including athlete's foot and ringworm [15-18]. These formulations often include salicylic acid to improve their effectiveness [19]. BA is a valuable component in the medical treatment because of its effectiveness, when it is used at certain doses [20]. The use of BA in fungicidal products for medicinal reasons and even in agriculture is because of its characteristics, specifically its ability to inhibit enzyme activity [21].
This review explores a comprehensive and extensive investigation of BA within the pharmaceutical industry, emphasizing its lifecycle and environmental impact. Explaining the primary aspects that provide meaningful additional understanding of the concerned issue. The review denotes a detailed and structured explanation, including many studies to provide a comprehensive understanding of the topic by suggesting a thorough exploration of BA's role and transformation within the environment, especially the pharmaceutical sector, from its initial manufacturing to its final stages. Highlighting the starting point of BA’s lifecycle manufacturing processes. Indicating the diverse applications of BA in pharmaceuticals, potentially covering its roles as a preservative, antiseptic, and other medicinal uses. Addressing the end-of-life phase of BA, the review tries to hint at the methods of disposal and their environmental ramifications, which is crucial for understanding its full lifecycle impact. An analysis of how it is treated or extracted from various wastewaters including the technologies and methods involved. By focusing on the environmental aspect, the current work underscores the importance of ecological considerations, pointing to a critical evaluation of how the use of benzoic acid affects the environment. This information is essential for understanding the overall impact of BA on the environment throughout its lifespan. The current paper emphasizes the significance of sustainability and ecological factors by specifically inspecting the ecotoxicity of BA in different aquatic and soil systems. Thus, this study provides a comprehensive assessment of BA usage in pharmaceuticals, including safety, toxicological, and environmental impacts, making it important to pharmaceutical business professionals and environmentalists.

Benzoic Acid Manufacturing and Environmental Impact

BA is produced by a manufacturing process that involves the utilization of raw materials such as toluene and manganese naphthenates [22]. This process may raise environmental issues due to the potential release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) of toluene, VOCs are compounds that have a high vapor pressure and easily evaporate at room temperature [23]. Additionally, there exists a potential for contamination linked to BA production when utilizing toxic chemical compounds such as manganese or cobalt naphthenate catalysts [24, 25].
As shown in Figure 1, to produce BA, cobalt or manganese naphthenates catalyze the partial oxidation of toluene with air [26]. This technology, the toluene oxidation process, is popular since it is efficient and cheap. The process involves toluene, a solvent, and a catalyst that are heated and pressurized with oxygen existence [27]. While there are other ways to synthesize BA, the majority of them are impractical from both an economic and environmental perspective [28]. Crystallization or other separation methods to purify the BA are then applied to make it appropriate for food preservation, pharmaceutical products, and other industrial usages [29].
Today's ecologically conscious world requires medicinal eco-friendly technology. This reduces the industry's environmental impact and aids climate change mitigation and resource conservation. Green chemistry, renewable energy, and more efficient manufacturing can reduce waste, energy use, and toxic emissions in pharmaceutical companies. These merits can considerably reduce potential environmental risk during BA manufacturing processes.

Benzoic Acid's Pharmaceutical Applications and Human Toxicity

BA originates naturally in a variety of plants and foods, including fruits and vegetables, with varying quantities depending on the plant's growing conditions [30]. Due to its use in food preservation, chemical synthesis, and pharmaceuticals, BA was produced at 538,770 tons worldwide in 2020, and it is expected to grow to 628,350 tons by 2026 [31]. In 2022, the pharmaceutical industry uses 12% of total BA annual production, as illustrated in Figure 2 [32]. BA is a versatile pharmaceutical product utilized for its antimicrobial, antifungal, and preservative properties [33-36]. It is often found in medications that are put on the skin to treat rashes, irritation, eczema, and fungal diseases [37]. Also, BA or its derivatives like salicylic acid are added to creams and ointments that are used to treat skin diseases like psoriasis and seborrheic dermatitis [38, 39] and may assist with the removal of dead skin cells when it is present in higher quantities [40]. Because of its antibacterial properties, it is utilized in numerous non-prescription medications for the treatment of small cuts and burns [41]. BA is also utilized as a preservative in pharmaceutical compositions to maintain the stability of medicines and prolong their shelf life [42-44]. BA and its salts, such as sodium benzoate, are commonly included in liquid medicines, lotions, and certain oral formulas to inhibit the growth of germs and yeast [45]. Some cough medicines to help patients cough up and get rid of mucus contain BA and its derivatives [46].
BA undergoes a quick metabolism and is excreted by urine during 24 hours [47], it is quickly taken up by the digestive system and combined with glycine in the liver, resulting in the formation of hippuric acid. Within 6 hours of being absorbed, practically all of the hippuric acid is eliminated in the urine [48]. The BA is efficiently absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract. BA is metabolized in the liver after absorption. Hepatocyte mitochondrial glycine N-acyltransferase conjugates glycine with hippuric acid (benzoylglycine) in the major metabolic pathway [49]. Hippuric acid is the main metabolite eliminated in urine for most of BA consumed [50]. A secondary mechanism forms benzoyl glucuronide, which is eliminated in urine, by conjugating with glucuronic acid. Cytochrome P450 enzymes, can hydroxylate tiny quantities of BA to 4-hydroxybenzoic acid. Metabolites, mostly hippuric acid, are excreted by the kidneys, mostly by urine. BA's efficient metabolism and elimination reduce systemic buildup, reducing its toxicity in humans [51]. BA can also be absorbed through inhalation or human skin with an overall mean flux equal to 16.54 + 11.87 µ g/cm2/h [52]. It should be noted that certain derivatives of BA, such as sodium benzoate and benzoyl peroxide, can be absorbed by the skin or consumed in medical formulations [53]. Once absorbed, they are transformed into BA and enter the bloodstream. Upon absorption and ingestion, these derivatives undergo metabolism, resulting in the presence of BA in the bloodstream. Subsequently, BA is then excreted through the urine system [54].
Most people are considered safe with BA-containing treatments as long as they follow the directions on approved medications. Most harmful effects occur when individuals consume high levels or experience prolonged exposure. According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendations, BA is considered acceptable for use in food as an antibacterial or preservation agent and adjuvant, as long as it does not exceed a maximum level of 0.1%. The FDA has not determined whether significantly different conditions of use would be generally recognized as safe (GRAS) [55]. No specific level has been identified for BA toxicity in medications yet; nevertheless, in food, a threshold of an acceptable daily intake (ADI) value of 5 mg/kg/day was adopted in 2016, according to a joint committee of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO) [56].
The topical application of BA might cause specific side effects and allergic reactions such as skin irritation, redness, and itching, particularly at higher concentrations [57-59]. Individuals may develop allergic responses to BA or its salts, which might manifest as mild contact dermatitis [60] like urticaria [61]. Furthermore, experiencing gastrointestinal discomfort when consuming excessive quantities of BA orally (about 677.9 mg/kg bw-day), might result in symptoms such as vomiting [62]. Metabolic acidosis can occur in rare instances, especially in neonates or those with compromised liver function, when excessive dosages of BA or its salts are administered [63]. Since glycine is utilized by the liver and kidneys for BA detoxification [64, 65], excessive consumption of glycine results in a reduction of its levels in the body, which may lead to several consequences, like diarrhea, muscular weakness, seizures, reduced activity, and extreme weight loss, when a high quantity of BA is taken [66]. The most significant adverse effect of BA consumption in humans is its ability to displace bilirubin from albumin [67]. This condition might trigger serious diseases like encephalopathy, particularly in infants [68]. While BA is not carcinogenic, it can react with ascorbic acid (vitamin C) to produce benzene, a known carcinogen, through decarboxylation. This primarily concerns the use of non-alcoholic beverages or their consumption with medications [69]. BA may interact with other substances and significantly affect liver function or pH equilibrium in the body [70, 71].
The toxicity of BA might have mitodepressive and genotoxic effects at very low concentrations of 10 mg/L. This was identified using Allium cepa as a biomarker, affecting physiological, biochemical, cytological, and genetic characteristics [72]. Depending on the dosage, BA can induce significant genotoxic effects in human lymphocyte cells, such as sister chromatid exchange (SCE), chromosomal aberrations (CA), mitotic index (MI) reduction, and micronuclei (MN) increase [73]. Toxicity from BA typically occurs when high doses are consumed, overwhelming the body's metabolic capacity to detoxify and excrete it [74]. However, when intake exceeds the liver's ability to process it, unmetabolized BA can accumulate in the bloodstream, leading to adverse effects. Symptoms of toxicity may include metabolic acidosis, characterized by a drop in blood pH, which can cause various adverse effects. Toxicity is more likely in individuals with compromised liver or kidney function, as these organs are critical for the detoxification and elimination of BA and its metabolites [62].

Benzoic Acid Occurrence in Industrial and Municipal Wastewaters

In addition to their widespread use in pharmaceutical products, BA is extensively used as a raw material in industry, to produce chemicals such as benzoyl chloride, phenol, and benzoate plasticizers [75, 76]. BA is also classified as a food supplement (E210) and is extensively utilized as preservatives in the food industry [77]. Several food products, including soft beverages, canned vegetables and fruits, fruit juices, and fish products, commonly include BA as a dietary supplement [78, 79]. The average concentration levels of benzoic acid used in food products range from 0.05% to 0.1% [80].
The industrial manufacturing process of BA, mostly through the partial oxidation of toluene, generates a range of waste compounds, which might result in organic byproducts and unreacted materials, especially organic cyclic compounds that have considerable impacts on aquatic quality and are very harmful for individuals and the environment [81], these waste streams may contain traces of BA. There may also be wastewater and solid waste during the purification process. Besides amounts of BA, the wastewater includes different types of liquid wastes with dissolved salts and organic impurities, and the solid wastes include used catalysts, filter cakes, and separation residue [82, 83]. BA traces found also in industrial discharge originated from other industrial sources, as BA is commonly employed as an intermediate chemical, preservative, and antiseptic in various food, beverage, cosmetic, and petrochemical industries [84]. Various aromatic and cyclic hydrocarbons are released from petroleum refining and petrochemical industry; the effluents may contain considerable traces of BA [85]. As an example, the industrial wastewater produced during the manufacturing of purified terephthalic acid (TPA), which is a key ingredient in various textile and plastic products, contains a significant quantity of BA. This BA, along with four other organic compounds, makes up approximately 75% of the chemical oxygen demand (COD) present in the influent wastewater [86], while a wastewater containing both BA and TPA with other metals has a COD of 3320 mg/L and a biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) of 316.2 mg/L for BA [87]. The industrial wastewater effluents containing BA may exhibit a total organic carbon (TOC) concentration of 67.5 mg/L and a pH value of 3.5 [88].
It is difficult to distinguish between BA traces in municipal wastewater from drugs or food, so both sources are considered. The majority of BA is found in municipal wastewater because it is widely used as a preservative in food and pharmaceuticals, in their original form or as metabolized substances and is discharged into surface water through excrement [89]. BA is released into the wastewater as a result of its widespread use as a preservative. It originates from the excreta of individuals and wastewater from hospitals [90], resulting in elevated levels of BA in certain water bodies worldwide. Despite undergoing various treatments, BA concentrations in groundwater samples from Florida reached as high as 27.5-67 mg/L [91].

Techniques for Benzoic Acid Treatment in Wastewater

Effective waste management measures, such as recycling technologies and wastewater treatment, are critical to reducing BA production's environmental impact. Physical, chemical, and biological methods can treat cyclic organic industrial effluents. These include extraction, adsorption, coagulation, oxidation, biofilm, and membrane [92]. Examples of these processes are presented in Table 1. Factors such as convenience of design, cost, and efficiency should be considered while selecting an appropriate approach [93].
Many adsorption approaches have been proposed for treating BA in wastewater, as BA at specific concentrations may impair aquatic ecosystems, disrupt soil microbial balance, and induce toxicity in particular species. The extraction of BA through adsorption using carbon nanotubes plays a crucial role in enhancing the removal of pollutants from wastewater by means of functionalization and treatment [94]. Various carbon nanotube pretreatments for enhancing the adsorption capacity of BA are studied, such as oxidized, purified carbon nanotubes, and calcined carbon nanotubes [95]. The Fenton reaction is one of the more interesting advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) for treating water and wastewater containing BA because of its quick reaction rate, ease of usage, and eco-friendly [96]. The emulsion liquid membrane (ELM) process is also proposed for extracting organic acids from wastewater. ELM is created by combining two phases that do not mix and then spreading the resulting emulsion into a third phase, which is the continuous phase of the wastewater [97]. Photocatalysis, a type of AOP, is also commonly employed for the degradation of pharmaceuticals in wastewater due to its numerous benefits, such as the generation of free radicals, a high rate of removal, and minimal sludge production [98]. Air flotation is an efficient and expedient method compared to precipitation for segregating lightweight particles and oils from wastewater, resulting in a reduced amount of sludge. The efficacy of eliminating organic substances can exceed 98%, contingent upon variables such as duration and intensity of separation, dose of chemical additives, dimensions of gas bubbles, and duration of saturation [99]. Other approaches using chemical oxidation processes have been explored for BA treatment, for example, a heterogeneous system of UV-persulfate oxidation for the oxidative degradation of organic contaminants, including BA, by using UV-activated green rust [100]. Bio-film degradation in constructed wetlands (CWs) uses natural mechanisms to remove BA from wastewater. Aerobic and anaerobic biodegradation, photo-degradation, substrate adsorption, and plant uptake and degradation are the main CW processes for BA’s treatments [101].

Benzoic Acid Entry to the Environment

Despite the extensive treatment of BA in wastewater plants, significant amounts of BA still make their way to the environment through water bodies, sediment, and finally soil. Figure 3 illustrates the main pathways of BA occurrence in the environment.
Since BA, at certain concentration, is moderately toxic to aquatic organisms, can alter microbial communities in soil, inhibit plant growth, and in the presence of other compounds, BA can potentially form derivatives. Some of which might be persistent organic pollutants (POPs) such as chlorinated BA [102], these pollutants are resistant to chemical or biological degradation, highly environmentally mobile, and bioaccumulate in the food chain [103]. BA can be introduced into the environment via the discharge of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). The issue arises when the compound is not completely eliminated during the treatment processes, hence enabling its release into the receiving water bodies [104]. Although WWTPs are intended to eliminate various pollutants, BA may persist through the treatment phases, particularly when present in large concentrations or if the treatment method is not specifically adapted to remove it [105]. Releasing this substance into water ecosystems raises worries about potential environmental consequences, as BA has the ability to alter the quality of water and the species that live in it [106], especially in places with a large concentration of people or industrial activity. During wastewater treatment, aromatic hydrocarbons, preservatives, and some pharmaceuticals partially biodegrade [107-109]. Many complex molecules are converted into simpler ones, including BA. For example, the breakdown of preservatives like benzyl alcohol, commonly used in food and pharmaceuticals, produces BA [110]. BA can also arise from complicated pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PCPs) that include aromatic rings during biodegradation. In WWTPs, while numerous organic contaminants undergo degradation, the process is not consistently thorough. Due to their resistance to biodegradation, substances like BA can remain intact during treatment and be released into surface water or soil [111]. Surface water typically contains BA as an intermediate result of the organic breakdown. Once in the environment, BA may degrade further, but at a slower rate, contributing to its detection in surface water bodies and soils. Due to the slow degradation of sewage sludge from treatment plants, substantial amounts of BA are still present in the sewage sludge upon disposal [112]. In fact, after using biodegradation strains, BA was found in discarded sludge in various ratios [113]. The use of biosolids from WWTPs may lead to the gradual accumulation of BA in the environment [114]. BA in soil will likely persist for a long time after release into the environment because of its high sorption and poor biodegradation rates [115 116]. Once disposed of in landfills or applied to soils, BA can also leach into the groundwater, causing groundwater contamination that has already been detected in many places [117 118]. The already complicated chemical mixture of the aquatic system's water cycle is further complicated when leachate enters from the soil, which in turn affects the food chain [119]. Contamination of the environment occurs as a result of inadequate treatment of BA from WWTPs and the subsequent discharge of effluents. BA can form as a disinfection by-product (DBP) during drinking water treatment and enter water bodies [120]. BA is released into air, water, and soil, with water being the primary medium, mainly through wastewater treatment plant discharges. During production, VOCs like toluene can release it into the air, contributing to pollution. In water, BA often persists through treatment, entering rivers and lakes, potentially harming aquatic ecosystems. In soil, it accumulates via biosolids application, leaching into groundwater due to its slow degradation, causing contamination. While released into all three media, water is the dominant pathway, emphasizing the need for improved treatment and waste management to reduce its environmental impact and protect ecosystems and water quality.
Because BA is a degradation intermediate, which means that it is further mineralized [125], it needs more sophisticated ways to fully be mineralized to have less of an effect on aquatic environments. BA occurs also naturally in soil; it comes from plant debris and fallen leaves [126]. Biodegradation breaks down BA into simpler products [127]. BA affects soil pH and microbial activity, improving soil health and fertility [128 129], when it exists at allowable levels [130]. It illustrates the complex natural mechanisms that support soil ecosystems and recycle nutrients. BA concentrations in the environment range widely, as shown in Table 2, indicating the importance of the BA contamination issue.

Benzoic Acid Toxicity in the Environment

The presence of BA in surface water from WWTP effluents can have a variety of environmental consequences. One significant impact is on aquatic ecosystems; for instance, BA, although low in toxicity, can contribute to the overall chemical load, potentially disrupting microbial communities at high BA levels that are crucial for nutrient cycling and maintenance of water quality [131]. For example, the inhibition of nitrifying bacteria, essential for converting ammonia to nitrate, can lead to elevated ammonia levels, which are harmful to fish and other aquatic organisms [132].
Furthermore, the existence of BA can have a synergistic impact with other pollutants, intensifying their harmful effects. When combined with other organic acids, it has the potential to impact the growth and reproduction of algae, which are crucial species in aquatic food chains. This disturbance can propagate throughout the environment, impacting higher trophic levels, such as fish and invertebrates [133].
The presence of BA in surface water can serve as an indicator for the existence of other recalcitrant organic pollutants, implying inadequate treatment of wastewater and presenting long-term hazards to both the environment and human well-being. If they are not effectively eliminated, they can lead to the persistence of other detrimental compounds such as pharmaceuticals and endocrine disruptors [134]. This can pose a greater risk to aquatic life and potentially result in these substances entering the human food chain through bioaccumulation.
The widespread use of BA releases it into the environment, and high intake poses health risks to humans and animals. The prolonged presence of benzoic acid in the environment leads to the selection of biofilm and microorganisms (mold, yeast, bacteria) that are resistant to the inhibitory effect of this pollutant [135-137]. In anaerobic environments, such as sediments or waterlogged soils, the half-life of BA can range from weeks to months, depending on the availability of specific anaerobic degraders. In soil, BA degradation followed first-order kinetics, with half-lives ranging from 37.46 to 66.00 days [138]. In considering anaerobic conditions, especially in sediment, BA degradation can be slower. The half-life of benzoic acid in anaerobic environments can range from weeks to months, depending on the microbial community and conditions [139]. Efficient drinking water treatment is essential to prevent the risk of the pollutant returning through water resources [140 141]. Unqualified water purification systems often fail to remove all contaminants, allowing pollutants to cycle back to humans, while the application of energy-efficient technologies in treatment processes not only enhances purification effectiveness but also reduces the environmental impact and operational costs associated with water treatment [142].
Investigating the microbiome of areas contaminated with synthetic aromatic chemicals will enable the identification and analysis of novel aerobic bacterial strains that have the ability to break down aromatic contaminants, including BA. Table 3 shows recent studies about the toxicities of BA in the environment. Biotechnological approaches based on aerobic bacteria capabilities can be used as an effective and safe way for remediating chemically polluted environments [157], especially for BA. Consequently, investigating biodegradation potentials techniques is considered significant for BA removal.
The concentrations of BA observed in Table 2 vary significantly across different environmental media, and their potential toxicity can be assessed using the toxicity data in Table 3. In surface water, concentrations range from 0.8 µg/L in Germany to 230.45 µg/L in China, which are generally below the chronic NOEC (No-Observed Effect Concentration) of 10 mg/L for sensitive aquatic species like Daphnia magna. However, groundwater samples show much higher concentrations, such as 9488 µg/L in Germany and 9424 µg/L in the UK, which could approach or exceed toxic thresholds for some organisms. Soil and sediment concentrations, ranging from 12.2 µg/kg to 10,522.3 µg/kg, are also below the NOEC for earthworms (50 mg/kg). Overall, while most surface water and soil concentrations are unlikely to cause toxicity, certain groundwater samples may pose a risk, particularly in contaminated areas. The PNEC (Predicted No-Effect Concentration) for aquatic environments (0.1 mg/L) and soil (0.5 mg/kg) suggests that only the highest concentrations in groundwater and some sediments could be of concern.

Conclusions

The review emphasizes the critical evaluation of BA's lifecycle, particularly its environmental impact throughout its use in the pharmaceutical industry. It highlights the need for sustainability and ecological considerations in its applications. It discusses the manufacturing processes of BA, detailing how it is synthesized or extracted, and the technologies involved. This foundational understanding is essential for assessing its environmental footprint. The review also addresses the diverse applications of BA in pharmaceuticals, including its roles as a preservative and antiseptic. This broad usage underscores the importance of understanding its implications for health and the environment. Furthermore, the end-of-life phase of BA is critically examined, focusing on disposal methods and their environmental ramifications. This aspect is crucial for comprehending the full lifecycle impact of BA.
To understand BA's role and transformation in the pharmaceutical industry and promote sustainable usage and disposal. The review employs five main methods to comprehensively examine benzoic acid's (BA) lifecycle and environmental impact. It begins with a thorough literature review to gather existing data on BA's journey from manufacturing to disposal. The study then critically evaluates BA's synthesis processes, applications, and disposal methods, highlighting the environmental ramifications at each stage. It analyzes BA's diverse pharmaceutical applications, including its roles as a preservative and antifungal agent. The paper assesses BA's entry into the environment, particularly through wastewater treatment plants, and examines potential ecological consequences. Finally, it explores various techniques for treating BA-containing wastewater, such as advanced oxidation processes and membrane separation methods, to mitigate environmental impact.
The review suggests more research on BA's environmental impact, particularly its persistence in wastewater treatment systems. Understanding how it reacts during treatment might help reduce water pollution. Future research could explore BA manufacturing methods with lower environmental impact. This includes researching greener synthesis processes that release fewer byproducts. BA disposal procedures should be assessed and upgraded to improve environmental safety. This could involve evaluating BA degradation mechanisms in different disposal circumstances. To comprehend BA's lifetime and its effects, the review emphasizes interdisciplinary approaches that combine pharmacological, environmental, and industrial perspectives. Finally, it encourages collaboration between industry and environmentalists to promote sustainable BA use and disposal.

Notes

Acknowledgement
The authors are thankful to the Department of Pharmacy, Al-Qalam University College for providing the necessary sources to achieve this work.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
CRediT author statement
HI: Conceptualization, Supervision, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing-Original draft preparation, Visualization, Writing-Reviewing and Editing. DM: Conceptualization, Investigation, Data Curation, Visualization.

Supplementary Material

Add short descriptions of supplementary material. This material is available online at www.eaht.org.

References

1. Flórez-Méndez J, López J. Food additives: Importance, classification, and adverse reactions in humans. In: Valencia GA editors. Natural additives in foods. Springer; 2023. 1-31.

2. Chipley JR. Sodium benzoate and benzoic acid. In: Davidson PM, Taylor TM, David JRD, editors. Antimicrobials in food. 4th ed. CRC Press; 2020. 41-88.

3. Anurova MN, Bakhrushina EO, Demina NB, Panteleeva ES. Modern preservatives of microbiological stability. Pharm Chem J 2019;53: 564-571 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11094-019-02038-4.
crossref
4. Yerlikaya O, Gucer L, Akan E, Meric S, Aydin E, Kinik O. Benzoic acid formation and its relationship with microbial properties in traditional Turkish cheese varieties. Food Bioscience 2021;41: 101040 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2021.101040.
crossref
5. Wali B, Othman N, Rashid S, Hamid S, Issa H. A short overview of benzalkonium chloride in pharmaceutical sector: Safety, environmental impact and alternatives. ChemRxiv; 2024. https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-zfj3p-v2.

6. Peters BJ, Groninger AS, Fontes FL, Crick DC, Crans DC. Differences in interactions of benzoic acid and benzoate with interfaces. Langmuir 2016;32(37):9451-9459 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02073.
crossref pmid pmc
7. Dutt B, Choudhary M, Budhwar V. Preparation, characterization and evaluation of aspirin: benzoic acid cocrystals with enhanced pharmaceutical properties. Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2020;6: 32 https://doi.org/10.1186/s43094-020-00052-y.
crossref
8. Shahmohammadi M, Javadi M, Nassiri-Asl M. An overview on the effects of sodium benzoate as a preservative in food products. Biotechnology and Health Sciences 2016;3(3):e35084. https://doi.org/10.17795/BHS-35084.
crossref
9. Johnson W, Bergfeld WF, Belsito DV, Hill RA, Klaassen CD, Liebler DC, et al. Safety assessment of benzyl alcohol, benzoic acid and its salts, and benzyl benzoate. Int J Toxicol 2017;36(3_suppl):5S-30S https://doi.org/10.1177/1091581817728996.
crossref pmid
10. Sharma P, Garai P, Banerjee P, Saha S, Chukwuka AV, Chatterjee S, et al. Behavioral toxicity, histopathological alterations and oxidative stress in Tubifex tubifex exposed to aromatic carboxylic acids- acetic acid and benzoic acid: A comparative time-dependent toxicity assessment. Sci Total Environ 2023;876: 162739 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162739.
crossref pmid
11. Al-Shemary RS, Jasem H, Hadi AG, Baqir SJ. Boosted antibacterial efficacy: Di and triorganotin complexes via 2-[(2,3-dimethylphenyl)amino]benzoic acid. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Ethiopia 2024;38(3):647-655 https://doi.org/10.4314/bcse.v38i3.8.
crossref
12. Golovina A, Proia E, Fiorentino F, Yunin M, Kasatkina M, Zigangirova N, et al. (Heteroarylmethyl)benzoic acids as a new class of bacterial cystathionine γ-lyase inhibitors: Synthesis, biological evaluation, and molecular modeling. ACS Infect Dis 2024;10(6):2127-2150 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.4c00136.
crossref pmid
13. Yan C, Zhang Q, Xiao P, Xie X, Li M, Qiu Y, et al. Structure-activity relationships of 2-(arylthio)benzoic acid FTO inhibitors. Israel Journal of Chemistry 2024;64(34):e202300166. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijch.202300166.
crossref
14. Kucera K, Zenzola N, Hudspeth A, Dubnicka M, Hinz W, Bunick CG, et al. Benzoyl peroxide drug products form benzene. Environ Health Perspect 2024;132(3):37702 https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP13984.
crossref pmid pmc
15. Yang H, Liu Y, Wen F, Yan X, Zhang Y, Zhong Z. Preparation, characterization, antioxidant and antifungal activities of benzoic acid compounds grafted onto chitosan. Int J Biol Macromol 2024;259(Pt 1):129096 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.129096.
crossref pmid
16. Chandira RM, Pethappachetty P, Vijayasankar GR, Sivalingam R. Design, optimization and evaluation of microemulgel containing antifungal drugs. Asian Journal of Biological and Life Sciences 2022;11(2):374-379 https://doi.org/10.5530/ajbls.2022.11.50.
crossref
17. Al-Farha AA, Mahmood AA. Evaluation of three topical antifungals against bovine ringworm. Veterinary Practitioner 2021;22(2):41-44.

18. Chatterjee AN. Role of antifungal therapy in treating different types of fungal infections and it’s future: A systematic review. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 2023;13(2):129-135 https://doi.org/10.52711/2231-5691.2023.00026.
crossref
19. Shihab TJ, Ibrahim ZI, Jumma QS, Khorsheed HH. Dermatophytosis in bovine, recent clinical analysis, treatment, and updated zoonotic infection: A review article. Tikrit Journal of Veterinary Sciences 2023;1(1):116-129 https://doi.org/10.25130/tjvs.23.1.13.
crossref
20. Turnbull D, Jack MM, Coder PS, Picut CA, Rodricks JV. Extended one-generation reproductive toxicity (EOGRT) study of benzoic acid in sprague dawley rats. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2021;122: 104897 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.104897.
crossref pmid
21. Guan L, Long H, Ren F, Li Y, Zhang H. A structure-Activity relationship study of the inhibition of α-amylase by benzoic acid and its derivatives. Nutrients 2022;14(9):1931 https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14091931.
crossref pmid pmc
22. Gizli A, Aytimur G, Alpay E, Atalay S. Catalytic liquid phase oxidation of toluene to benzoic acid. Chemical Engineering & Technology 2008;31(3):409-416 https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.200700140.
crossref
23. Paolin E, Strlič M. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in heritage environments and their analysis: A review. Applied Sciences 2024;14(11):4620 https://doi.org/10.3390/app14114620.
crossref
24. Sotoudeh Y, Niksokhan MH, Karbassi A, Sarafrazi MR. Review on naphthenic acids: An important environmental pollutants caused by oil extraction and industries. Pollution 2023;9(1):254-270 https://doi.org/10.22059/poll.2022.344876.1532.
crossref
25. Huang H, Yu C, Han X, Huang H, Wei Q, Guo W, et al. Ni, co hydroxide triggers electrocatalytic production of high-purity benzoic acid over 400 mA cm-2. Energy & Environmental Science 2020;13: 4990-4999 https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EE02607G.
crossref
26. Suresh AK, Sharma MM, Sridhar T. Engineering aspects of industrial liquid-phase air oxidation of hydrocarbons. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2000;39(11):3958-3997 https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0002733.
crossref
27. Yuan Z, Chen B, Zhao J. Controllability analysis for the liquid-phase catalytic oxidation of toluene to benzoic acid. Chemical Engineering Science 2011;66(21):5137-5147 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2011.07.005.
crossref
28. Saha R, Sekar G. Selective oxidation of alkylarenes to aromatic acids/ketone in water by using reusable binaphthyl stabilized Pt nanoparticles (Pt-BNP) as catalyst. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 2019;250: 325-336 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.03.052.
crossref
29. Orehek J, Češnovar M, Teslić D, Likozar B. Mechanistic crystal size distribution (CSD)-based modelling of continuous antisolvent crystallization of benzoic acid. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 2021;170: 256-269 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2021.04.007.
crossref
30. Aresta A, Zambonin C. Simultaneous determination of salicylic, 3-methyl salicylic, 4-methyl salicylic, acetylsalicylic and benzoic acids in fruit, vegetables and derived beverages by SPME-LC-UV/DAD. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2016;121: 63-68 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2015.12.016.
crossref pmid
31. Čolnik M, Pečar D, Knez Ž, Goršek A, Škerget M. Kinetics study of hydrothermal degradation of PET waste into useful products. Processes 2022;10(1):24 https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10010024.
crossref
32. ChemAnalyst. Benzoic acid market analysis: Industry market size, plant capacity, production, operating efficiency, demand & supply, end-user industries, sales channel, regional demand, foreign trade, 2015-2030. [cited Dec 8, 2024]. Available from: https://www.chemanalyst.com/industry-report/benzoic-acid-market-280.

33. El-Zawawy NA, Ali SS, Khalil MA, Sun J, Nouh HS. Exploring the potential of benzoic acid derived from the endophytic fungus strain Neurospora crassa SSN01 as a promising antimicrobial agent in wound healing. Microbiol Res 2022;262: 127108 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2022.127108.
crossref pmid
34. Esfandiari Z, Ghassami N, Hosseini H. Examination of the antimicrobial preservatives of benzoic acid and sodium benzoate in different food products in Iran: A review of the current evidence. Journal of Health System Research 2017;13(1):1-9 https://doi.org/10.22122/jhsr.v13i1.2991.
crossref
35. Jeong MH, Lee YS, Cho JY, Ahn YS, Moon JH, Hyun HN, et al. Isolation and characterization of metabolites from Bacillus licheniformis MH48 with antifungal activity against plant pathogens. Microb Pathog 2017;110: 645-653 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2017.07.027.
crossref pmid
36. Ramesh H, Bhuyan AK. The food and pharmaceutical additive benzoic acid induces amyloid fibrillation of an intrinsically disordered protein. Biophys Chem 2024;306: 107172 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpc.2024.107172.
crossref pmid
37. Dash P, Debnath PB, Sahoo PN, Das PS, Dkhar P, Debnath JK, et al. A practical book of pharmaceutical organic chemistry-II. Booksclinic Publishing; 2022.

38. Leppard B. Treatment in dermatology. 1st ed. CRC Press; 2020.

39. Damman CJ. Salicylates and the microbiota: A new mechanistic understanding of an ancient drug's role in dermatological and gastrointestinal disease. Drug Development Research 2013;74(6):344-352 https://doi.org/10.1002/ddr.21086.
crossref
40. Khan FN, Saeed W, Mansoor M, Niazi N, Imtiaz A. Comparison of the outcome of 35% glycolic acid and 30% salicylic acid peels in treatment of patients with acne vulgaris. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences 2022;16(4):150 https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs22164150.
crossref
41. Stjepanovic AN, Todorovic NB, Tesic TZ, Komazec ZS, Canji-Panic JM, Lalic-Popovic MN. Pharmaceutical excipients with potential to cause adverse effects in paediatric nasal medicines. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2022;133: 105225 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105225.
crossref pmid
42. Poojary PV, Sarkar S, Poojary AA, Mallya P, Selvaraj R, Koteshwara A, et al. Novel anti-dandruff shampoo incorporated with ketoconazole-coated zinc oxide nanoparticles using green tea extract. J Cosmet Dermatol 2024;23(2):563-575 https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.16027.
crossref pmid
43. Ramireddy AR, Behara DK. Analytical method validation on simultaneous estimation of ozenoxacin and benzoic acid in pharmaceutical formulation. Acta Chromatographica 2023;35(3):278-285 https://doi.org/10.1556/1326.2022.01064.
crossref
44. Ammen EW, Al-Salihi S, Al-Salhi R. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry combined with successive dilution for the determination of preservatives in pharmaceuticals. Journal of Analytical Chemistry 2021;76(5):621-629 https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061934821050051.
crossref
45. Shitole S, Shinde S, Waghmare S, Kamble H. A review on preservatives used in pharmaceuticals and impacts on health. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals 2022;5(7):131-140.

46. Roy S, Majumder S, Deb A, Choudhury L. Microbial contamination of cosmetics and the pharmaceutical products, and their preservation strategies: A comprehensive review. Novel Research in Microbiology Journal 2023;7(5):2116-2137 https://doi.org/10.21608/nrmj.2023.317346.
crossref
47. Davidson PM, Sofos JN, Branen AL. Antimicrobials in food. 3rd ed. CRC Press; 2005.

48. Mose T, Kjaerstad MB, Mathiesen L, Nielsen JB, Edelfors S, Knudsen LE. Placental passage of benzoic acid, caffeine, and glyphosate in an ex vivo human perfusion system. J Toxicol Environ Health A 2008;71(15):984-991 https://doi.org/10.1080/01932690801934513.
crossref pmid
49. De Simone G, Balducci C, Forloni G, Pastorelli R, Brunelli L. Hippuric acid: Could became a barometer for frailty and geriatric syndromes? Ageing Res Rev 2021;72: 101466 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2021.101466.
crossref pmid
50. Badenhorst CPS, Erasmus E, van der Sluis R, Nortje C, van Dijk AA. A new perspective on the importance of glycine conjugation in the metabolism of aromatic acids. Drug Metab Rev 2014;46(3):343-361 https://doi.org/10.3109/03602532.2014.908903.
crossref pmid
51. Lees HJ, Swann JR, Wilson ID, Nicholson JK, Holmes E. Hippurate: The natural history of a mammalian–microbial cometabolite. Journal of Proteome Research 2013;12(4):1527-1546 https://doi.org/10.1021/pr300900b.
crossref pmid
52. van de Sandt JJM, van Burgsteden JA, Cage S, Carmichael PL, Dick I, Kenyon S, et al. In vitro predictions of skin absorption of caffeine, testosterone, and benzoic acid: a multi-centre comparison study. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2004;39(3):271-281 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2004.02.004.
crossref pmid
53. Condrò G, Guerini M, Castello M, Perugini P. Acne vulgaris, atopic dermatitis and rosacea: The role of the skin microbiota-A review. Biomedicines 2022;10(10):2523 https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10102523.
crossref pmid pmc
54. Jung Y, Choi S, Oh KS, Sun N. Exposure assessment of benzoic acid from processed foods in South Korea. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess 2022;39(1):14-23 https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2021.1999506.
crossref pmid
55. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Code of Federal Regulations(CFR), Title 21, Chapter I, Subchapter B. Part 184: Direct food substances affirmed as generally recognized as safe, Subpart B - Listing of specific substances affirmed as GRAS. [cited Dec 8, 2024]. Available from: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-184.

56. World Health Organization (WHO). Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants: Eightieth report of the joint FAO/WHO expert committee on food additives. [cited Dec 8, 2024]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241209953.

57. Gilissen L, Schollaert I, Huygens S, Goossens A. Iatrogenic allergic contact dermatitis in the (peri)anal and genital area. Contact Dermatitis 2021;84(6):431-438 https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13764.
crossref pmid
58. Larmi E, Lahti A, Hannuksela M. Immediate contact reactions to benzoic acid and the sodium salt of pyrrolidone carboxylic acid. Comparison of various skin sites. Contact Dermatitis 1989;20(1):38-40 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1989.tb03093.x.
crossref pmid
59. Wilhelm KP, Böttjer B, Siegers CP. Quantitative assessment of primary skin irritants in vitro in a cytotoxicity model: comparison with in vivo human irritation tests. Br J Dermatol 2001;145(5):709-715 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04497.x.
crossref pmid
60. Schalock PC, Dunnick CA, Nedorost S, Brod B, Warshaw E, Mowad C. American contact dermatitis society core allergen series: 2017 update. Dermatitis 2017;28(2):141-143 https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000261.
crossref pmid
61. Giménez-Arnau AM, Pesqué D, Maibach HI. Contact urticaria syndrome: A comprehensive review. Current Dermatology Reports 2022;11: 194-201 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13671-022-00379-0.
crossref pmid pmc
62. Zu K, Pizzurro DM, Lewandowski TA, Goodman JE. Pharmacokinetic data reduce uncertainty in the acceptable daily intake for benzoic acid and its salts. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2017;89: 83-94 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.07.012.
crossref pmid
63. Clouser A, Diseroad E. Harmful excipients for pediatric patients. Contemporary PEDS Journal 2022;39(1):26-31.

64. Temellini A, Mogavero S, Giulianotti PC, Pietrabissa A, Mosca F, Pacifici GM. Conjugation of benzoic acid with glycine in human liver and kidney: a study on the interindividual variability. Xenobiotica 1993;23(12):1427-1433 https://doi.org/10.3109/00498259309059451.
crossref pmid
65. Zhang H, Fu P, Ke B, Wang S, Li M, Han L, et al. Metabolomic analysis of biochemical changes in the plasma and urine of collagen-induced arthritis in rats after treatment with Huang-Lian-Jie-Du-Tang. J Ethnopharmacol 2014;154(1):55-64 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2014.03.007.
crossref pmid
66. Del Olmo A, Calzada J, Nuñez M. Benzoic acid and its derivatives as naturally occurring compounds in foods and as additives: Uses, exposure, and controversy. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2017;57(14):3084-3103 https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2015.1087964.
crossref pmid
67. Boiadjiev SE, Lightner DA. Novel benzoic acid congeners of bilirubin. J Org Chem 2003;68(20):7591-7604 https://doi.org/10.1021/jo030091t.
crossref pmid
68. Iskander I, Gamaleldin R. Acute bilirubin encephalopathy: Some lessons learned. Semin Perinatol 2021;45(1):151353 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semperi.2020.151353.
crossref pmid
69. Leesuraplanon C, Jayasena V, Karnpanit W. Risk assessment of exposure to benzoic acid and benzene from consumption of functional drinks. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 2022;57: 6805-6812 https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.16029.
crossref
70. Udo II, Ukpe RA. Determination of the effect of concentration of sodium benzoate in fruit juice containing ascorbic acid. Nigerian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Applied Science Research 2022;11(4):20-27 https://doi.org/10.60787/nijophasr-v11-i4-511.
crossref
71. Rabiu S, Abubakar MG, Sahabi DM, Makusidi MA, Dandare A, Bello JH. Benzoic acid based beverages: Health implications. Asian Food Science Journal 2021;20(4):93-105 https://doi.org/10.9734/afsj/2021/v20i430290.
crossref
72. Samoylov AV, Suraeva NM, Zaytseva M, Rachkova VP, Kurbanova M, Petrov AN. Comparative assessment of sorbic and benzoic acid via express biotest. Foods and Raw Materials 2020;8(1):125-133 http://doi.org/10.21603/2308-4057-2020-1-125-133.
crossref
73. Patel D, Ramani R. A review on in vitro genotoxic effects of food preservatives on human lymphocytes. International Research Journal of Biological Sciences 2017;6(7):15-18.

74. Tormoehlen LM, Tekulve KJ, Nañagas KA. Hydrocarbon toxicity: A review. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2014;52(5):479-489 http://doi.org/10.3109/15563650.2014.923904.
crossref pmid
75. Kutz M. Applied plastics engineering handbook. 3rd ed. William Andrew Publishing; 2024. p. 595-618.

76. Karak N. Fundamentals of polymers: Raw materials to finish products. PHI Learning Pvt Ltd; 2009.

77. EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources (ANS). Scientific opinion on the re-evaluation of benzoic acid (E 210), sodium benzoate (E 211), potassium benzoate (E 212) and calcium benzoate (E 213) as food additives. EFSA Journal 2016;14(3):4433 https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4433.
crossref
78. Hammond DA. Analysis of soft drinks and fruit juices. In: Ashurst PR, editor. Chemistry and technology of soft drinks and fruit juices. 3rd ed. Wiley Blackwell; 2016. 231-289.

79. Tungkijanansin N, Alahmad W, Nhujak T, Varanusupakul P. Simultaneous determination of benzoic acid, sorbic acid, and propionic acid in fermented food by headspace solid-phase microextraction followed by GC-FID. Food Chem 2020;329: 127161 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127161.
crossref pmid
80. Bhattacharya S, Salama HHAA. Natural food preservatives. 1st ed. Jenny Stanford Publishing; 2023.

81. Zheng M, Han Y, Xu C, Zhang Z, Han H. Selective adsorption and bioavailability relevance of the cyclic organics in anaerobic pretreated coal pyrolysis wastewater by lignite activated coke. Sci Total Environ 2019;653: 64-73 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.331.
crossref pmid
82. Bodzek M. Membrane separation techniques – removal of inorganic and organic admixtures and impurities from water environment – review. Archives of Environmental Protection 2019;45(4):4-19 https://doi.org/10.24425/aep.2019.130237.
crossref
83. Ghanta M, Acharyya SS, Chaudhari RV, Subramaniam B. Catalytic aromatic oxidations. In: Mortier J, editor. Industrial arene chemistry: Markets, technologies, sustainable processes and cases studies of aromatic commodities. Wiley; 2023, 1067-1106.

84. Wu YT, Yang CE, Ko CH, Wang YN, Liu CC, Fu LM. Microfluidic detection platform with integrated micro-spectrometer system. Chemical Engineering Journal 2020;393(1):124700 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124700.
crossref
85. Singh R, Naik DV, Dutta RK, Kanaujia PK. Biochars for the removal of naphthenic acids from water: A prospective approach towards remediation of petroleum refinery wastewater. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020;266: 121986 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121986.
crossref
86. Behvandi A, Safekordi AA, Khorasheh F. Removal of benzoic acid from industrial wastewater using metal organic frameworks: equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic study. Journal of Porous Materials 2017;24: 165-178 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-016-0249-1.
crossref
87. Verma S, Prasad B, Mishra IM. Physicochemical and thermal characteristics of the sludge produced after thermochemical treatment of petrochemical wastewater. Environmental Technology 2012;33(15):1789-1801 https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2011.646316.
crossref pmid
88. Xu Y, Wang Q, Yoza BA, Li QX, Kou Y, Tang Y, et al. Catalytic ozonation of recalcitrant organic chemicals in water using vanadium oxides loaded ZSM-5 zeolites. Front Chem 2019;7: 384 https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.00384.
crossref pmid pmc
89. Daughton CG, Ruhoy IS. Environmental footprint of pharmaceuticals: The significance of factors beyond direct excretion to sewers. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2009;28(12):2495-2521 https://doi.org/10.1897/08-382.1.
crossref pmid
90. Guérette C, Lemoine P, Ramirez P, Segura PA. Determination of short-chain carboxylic acids and non-targeted analysis of water samples treated by wet air oxidation using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 2021;1652: 462352 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2021.462352.
crossref pmid
91. Karunanayake AG, Todd OA, Crowley ML, Ricchetti LB, Pittman Jr. CU, Anderson R, et al. Rapid removal of salicylic acid, 4-nitroaniline, benzoic acid and phthalic acid from wastewater using magnetized fast pyrolysis biochar from waste Douglas fir. Chemical Engineering Journal 2017;319: 75-88 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.02.116.
crossref
92. Shah KJ, Gandhi V. Advances in wastewater treatment II. Materials Research Foundations; 2021.

93. Issa HM. Optimization of wastewater treatment plant design using process dynamic simulation: A case study from Kurdistan, Iraq. ARO-The Scientific Jouranl of Koya University 2019;7(1):59-66 https://doi.org/10.14500/aro.10488.
crossref
94. Tajarudin HA, Razali YS, Chun CNW. Recovery of carboxylic acid from wastewater using carbon nanotubes. In: Dehghani MH, Karri RR, Mubarak NM, editors. Water treatment using engineered carbon nanotubes. 1st ed. Elsevier; 2024, 549-572.

95. De Luca P, Siciliano C, Macario A, Nagy JB. The role of carbon nanotube pretreatments in the adsorption of benzoic acid. Materials (Basel) 2021;14(9):2118 https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14092118.
crossref pmid pmc
96. He DQ, Zhang YJ, Pei DN, Huang GX, Liu C, Li J, et al. Degradation of benzoic acid in an advanced oxidation process: The effects of reducing agents. J Hazard Mater 2020;382: 121090 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121090.
crossref pmid
97. Akkar SAA, Mohammed SAM. The feasibility of emulsion liquid membrane for the extraction of organic acids from wastewater. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2021;1076: 012021 https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1076/1/012021.

98. Gupta B, Gupta AK, Bhatnagar A. Treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater using photocatalytic reactor and hybrid system integrated with biofilm based process: Mechanistic insights and degradation pathways. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2023;11(1):109141 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.109141.
crossref
99. Mofrad MMG, Pourzamani H, Amin MM, Parseh I, Alipour M. In situ treatment of metalworking wastewater by chemical addition-dissolved air flotation coupled with UV, H2O2 & ZnO. Heliyon 2020;6(1):e03091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03091.
crossref pmid pmc
100. Chen Y, Gao S, Liu Z, Shao S, Yin W, Fang Z, et al. Prolonged persulfate activation by UV irradiation of green rust for the degradation of organic pollutants. Environmental Chemistry Letters 2019;17(2):1017-1021 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-018-0815-7.
crossref
101. Wagner TV, Helmus R, Tapia SQ, Rijnaarts HHM, de Voogt P, Langenhoff AAM, et al. Non-target screening reveals the mechanisms responsible for the antagonistic inhibiting effect of the biocides DBNPA and glutaraldehyde on benzoic acid biodegradation. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2020;386: 121661 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121661.
crossref pmid
102. Hegedüs M, Gáborová K, Weidlich T, Kalivoda P, Briančin J, Tóthová E. Rapid hydrodehalogenation of chlorinated benzoic acids using mechano-thermally prepared Raney alloy with enhanced kinetics. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2021;9(4):105764 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105764.
crossref
103. Shumilovskih V, Egorova D, Demakov V. Disposal of preservative - Benzoic acid by a novel biotechnological method based on aerobic bacterial strains. AIP Conference Proceedings 2022;2390(1):030091 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0069064.
crossref
104. Issa HM, Alshatteri AH. Impacts of wastewater discharge from Kalar city on Diyala-Sirwan river water quality, Iraq: pollution evaluation, health risks of heavy metals contamination. Applied Water Science 2021;11(3):73 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-021-01397-2.
crossref
105. Mladenov N, Dodder NG, Steinberg L, Richardot W, Johnson J, Martincigh BS, et al. Persistence and removal of trace organic compounds in centralized and decentralized wastewater treatment systems. Chemosphere 2022;286(Pt 1):131621 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131621.
crossref pmid
106. Razika B, Abbes B, Messaoud C, Soufi K. Phenol and benzoic acid degradation by pseudomonas aeruginosa. Journal of Water Resource and Protection 2010;2(9):788-791 https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2010.29092.
crossref
107. Mashuri SIS, Ibrahim ML, Kasim MF, Mastuli MS, Rashid U, Abdullah AH, et al. Photocatalysis for organic wastewater treatment: From the basis to current challenges for society. Catalysts 2020;10(11):1260 https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10111260.
crossref
108. Caracciolo AB, Topp E, Grenni P. Pharmaceuticals in the environment: biodegradation and effects on natural microbial communities. A review. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2015;106: 25-36 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2014.11.040.
crossref pmid
109. Londry KL, Fedorak PM. Benzoic acid intermediates in the anaerobic biodegradation of phenols. Can J Microbiol 1992;38(1):1-11 https://doi.org/10.1139/m92-001.
crossref pmid
110. Wen X, Chen K, Su Y, Xiong K, Fan P, Wu J, et al. Efficient Life-Cycle Management: Recyclable self-support MnCuOxS1-x wastewater treatment catalyst for electrosynthesis of benzoic acid to accelerate hydrogen production. Chemical Engineering Journal 2024;493: 152510 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.152510.
crossref
111. Wang D, Sun L, Yu H, Zhang C, Guan X, Wang M, et al. Whole-genome analysis of the benzoic acid-degrading bacterium Bacillus halotolerans B28 to reveal its phytoprobiotic effects. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 2023;185: 105668 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2023.105668.
crossref
112. Rorat A, Courtois P, Vandenbulcke F, Lemiere S. Sanitary and environmental aspects of sewage sludge management. In: Prasad MNV, de Campos Favas PJ, Vithanage M, Mohan SV, editors. Industrial and municipal sludge: Emerging concerns and scope for resource recovery. Butterworth-Heinemann; 2019, 155-180.

113. Wang S, Zhang L, Wang X, Chen D, Li X, Huang Y. Screening of benzoic acid biodegradation strains. Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences 2010;15: 527-531 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11859-010-0696-5.
crossref
114. Mordechay EB, Tarchitzky J, Chen Y, Shenker M, Chefetz B. Composted biosolids and treated wastewater as sources of pharmaceuticals and personal care products for plant uptake: A case study with carbamazepine. Environ Pollut 2018;232: 164-172 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.029.
crossref pmid
115. Louis B, Pereira MM, Wang Q. Zeolite chemistry and applications. Frontiers; 2020.

116. Xiang W, Wei X, Tang H, Li L, Huang R. Complete genome sequence and biodegradation characteristics of benzoic acid-degrading bacterium Pseudomonas sp. SCB32. Biomed Res Int 2020;2020: 6146104 https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6146104.
crossref pmid pmc
117. Schwarzbauer J, Heim S, Brinker S, Littke R. Occurrence and alteration of organic contaminants in seepage and leakage water from a waste deposit landfill. Water Res 2002;36(9):2275-2287 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0043-1354(01)00452-3.
crossref pmid
118. Issa HM. Long-term evaluation of temporal variation in groundwater physicochemical quality: A case study of Erbil City, Iraq (2003-2015). Eurasian Journal of Science and Engineering 2018;4(1):32-48 https://doi.org/10.23918/eajse.v4i1sip32.
crossref
119. Nanusha MY, Frøkjær EE, Søndergaard J, Larsen MM, Glottrup CS, Nicolaisen JB, et al. Quantitative non-targeted screening to profile micropollutants in sewage sludge used for agricultural field amendments. Environ Sci Technol 2024;58(22):9850-9862 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c01441.
crossref pmid pmc
120. Issa HM. Comparative analysis of different disinfection techniques performances in drinking water treatment plant using a process simulation software. ZANCO Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences 2019;31(s3):1-8 https://doi.org/10.21271/ZJPAS.31.s3.1.
crossref
121. Zachritz WH, Lundie LL, Wang H. Benzoic acid degradation by small, pilot-scale artificial wetlands filter (AWF) systems. Ecological Engineering 1996;7(2):105-116 https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-8574(96)00003-1.
crossref
122. Sandhwar VK, Prasad B. A comparative study of electrochemical degradation of benzoic acid and terephthalic acid from aqueous solution of purified terephthalic acid (PTA) wastewater. Journal of Water Process Engineering 2019;30: 100381 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2017.03.006.
crossref
123. Garg KK, Prasad B. Electrochemical treatment of benzoic acid (BA) from aqueous solution and optimization of parameters by response surface methodology (RSM). Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers 2015;56: 122-130 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2015.04.005.
crossref
124. Ghadiri M, Shirazian S. Numerical simulation of reactive extraction of benzoic acid from wastewater via membrane contactors. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2017;24(12):11518-11527 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8817-8.
crossref pmid
125. Singla R, Ashokkumar M, Grieser F. The mechanism of the sonochemical degradation of benzoic acid in aqueous solutions. Research on Chemical Intermediates 2004;30: 723-733 https://doi.org/10.1163/1568567041856963.
crossref
126. Widhalm JR, Dudareva N. A familiar ring to it: Biosynthesis of plant benzoic acids. Mol Plant 2015;8(1):83-97 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2014.12.001.
crossref pmid
127. Hu R, Zhao H, Xu X, Wang Z, Yu K, Shu L, et al. Bacteria-driven phthalic acid ester biodegradation: Current status and emerging opportunities. Environ Int 2021;154: 106560 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106560.
crossref pmid
128. Pan Y, Peng Q, Huang K, Ji X, Zhou L, Deng G, et al. Impact of benzoic acid and 2,2’-methylenebis (6-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol) on the metabolome of flue-cured tobacco and rhizosphere microbial communities: implications for continuous cropping obstacles. Plant and Soil 2024;495: 137-155 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-023-06332-9.
crossref
129. Sokolova TA. Low-molecular-weight organic acids in soils: Sources, composition, concentrations, and functions: A review. Eurasian Soil Science 2020;53(5):580-594 https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229320050154.
crossref
130. World Health Organization (WHO). Benzoic acid and sodium benzoate. World Health Organization; 2000.

131. Talan A, Tyagi RD, Drogui P. Critical review on insight into the impacts of different inhibitors and performance inhibition of anammox process with control strategies. Environmental Technology & Innovation 2021;23: 101553 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.101553.
crossref
132. Edwards TM, Puglis HJ, Kent DB, Durán JL, Bradshaw LM, Farag AM. Ammonia and aquatic ecosystems - A review of global sources, biogeochemical cycling, and effects on fish. Sci Total Environ 2024;907: 167911 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167911.
crossref pmid
133. Wang HQ, Wu ZB, Zhang SH, Cheng SP, He F, Liang W. Relationship between the allelopathic activity and molecular structure of hydroxyl derivatives of benzoic acid and their effects on cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa. Allelopathy Journal 2008;22(1):205-211.

134. Haq I, Raj A. Endocrine-disrupting pollutants in industrial wastewater and their degradation and detoxification approaches. In: Bharagava R, Chowdhary P, editors. Emerging and eco-friendly approaches for waste management. Springer; 2019, 121-142.

135. Eklund T. Inhibition of microbial growth at different pH levels by benzoic and propionic acids and esters of p-hydroxybenzoic acid. International Journal of Food Microbiology 1985;2(3):159-167 https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1605(85)90035-2.
crossref
136. Piper PW. Resistance of yeasts to weak organic acid food preservatives. Adv Appl Microbiol 2011;77: 97-113 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387044-5.00004-2.
crossref pmid
137. Wei Q, Wang X, Cheng JH, Zeng G, Sun DW. Synthesis and antimicrobial activities of novel sorbic and benzoic acid amide derivatives. Food Chem 2018;268: 220-232 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.06.071.
crossref pmid
138. Zhou W, Jia H, Liu L, Li B, Li Y, Gao M. Environmental behaviors of (E) pyriminobac-methyl in agricultural soils. SOIL 2022;8: 237-252 https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-237-2022.
crossref
139. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). SIDS Initial assessment report for 12th SIAM: Terephthalic Acid (TPA). [cited Dec 8, 2024]. Available from: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://hpvchemicals.oecd.org/ui/handler.axd?id=AF8877C9-8DFB-45E0-8188-492EBA68CDAE.

140. Issa HM. Evaluation of water quality and performance for a water treatment plant: Khanaqin City as a case study. Journal of Garmian University 2017;3(S12):802-821 https://doi.org/10.24271/garmian.64.
crossref
141. Issa HM, Alrwai RA. Long-term drinking water quality assessment using index and multivariate statistical analysis for three water treatment plants of Erbil City, Iraq. UKH Journal of Science and Engineering 2018;2(2):39-48 https://doi.org/10.25079/ukhjse.v2n2y.
crossref
142. Issa HM. Energy-water nexus in East Iraq: capacity potential analysis and spatial assessment for an integrated CSP solar power & RO brackish water desalination plant in Khanaqin area. Water Practice and Technology 2021;16(3):904-923 https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2021.032.
crossref
143. Zhong X, Cui C, Yu S. Seasonal evaluation of disinfection by-products throughout two full-scale drinking water treatment plants. Chemosphere 2017;179: 290-297 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.03.103.
crossref pmid
144. Huang WJ, Fang GC, Wang CC. The determination and fate of disinfection by-products from ozonation of polluted raw water. Sci Total Environ 2005;345(1-3):261-272 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.10.019.
crossref pmid
145. Botalova O, Schwarzbauer J. Geochemical characterization of organic pollutants in effluents discharged from various industrial sources to riverine systems. Water Air and Soil Pollution 2011;221: 77-98 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-011-0771-3.
crossref
146. Jurado-Sánchez B, Ballesteros E, Gallego M. Determination of carboxylic acids in water by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry after continuous extraction and derivatisation. Talanta 2012;93: 224-232 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2012.02.022.
crossref pmid
147. Malakahmad A, Law MX, Ng KW, Manan TSA. The fate and toxicity assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in water streams of Malaysia. Procedia Engineering 2016;148: 806-811 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.572.
crossref
148. Bein E, Pasquazzo G, Dawas A, Yecheskel Y, Zucker I, Drewes JE, et al. Groundwater remediation by in-situ membrane ozonation: Removal of aliphatic 1,4-dioxane and monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2024;12(2):111945 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2024.111945.
crossref
149. Mishra S, Kumar P, Mehrotra I. Fate of 15 wastewater originated organic micropollutants in a sand column. Sustainable Water Resources Management 2021;7: 54 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-021-00535-7.
crossref
150. Williams GM, Smith B, Ross CAM. The migration and degradation of waste organic compounds in groundwater. Organic Geochemistry 1992;19(4–6):Pages 531-543 https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6380(92)90016-Q.
crossref
151. Betowski LD, Kendall DS, Pace CM, Donnelly JR. Characterization of groundwater samples from superfund sites by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Environmental Science & Technology 1996;30(12):3558-3564 https://doi.org/10.1021/es9602206.
crossref
152. Christensen P, Kristensen M, Hansen HCB, Borggaard OK, Christensen JH. A retrospective quantification study of benzoic acid, ibuprofen, and mecoprop in Danish groundwater samples. Environmental Advances 2022;7: 100180 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100180.
crossref
153. Liu SM, Chi WC. CO2-H2-dependent anaerobic biotransformation of phthalic acid isomers in sediment slurries. Chemosphere 2003;52(6):951-958 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00326-6.
crossref pmid
154. Norton DE. Use of sediment traps to monitor contaminant flux to city waterway sediments: Interim report. United States, Washington State Department of Ecology; 1990.

155. Kotelnikov NA, Sokolova TA, Tolpeshta II, Karavanova EI, Izosimova YG, Zavgorodnyaya YA. The content of benzoic acid in podzolic soil and its sorption on montmorillonite. Moscow University Soil Science Bulletin 2022;77: 30-36 https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147687422010045.
crossref
156. Baziramakenga R, Simard RR, Leroux GD. Determination of organic acids in soil extracts by ion chromatography. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 1995;27(3):349-356 https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(94)00178-4.
crossref
157. Manzoor MM. Environmental biotechnology: For sustainable future. In: Bhat RA, Hakeem KR, Dervash MA, editors. Bioremediation and biotechnology, Vol 2. Springer; 2020. 241-258.

158. Kamaya Y, Fukaya Y, Suzuki K. Acute toxicity of benzoic acids to the crustacean Daphnia magna. Chemosphere 2005;59(2):255-261 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.11.003.
crossref pmid
159. Lee PY, Chen CY. Toxicity and quantitative structure–activity relationships of benzoic acids to Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2009;165(1–3):156-161 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.09.086.
crossref pmid
160. Saha NC, Bhunia F, Kaviraj A. Comparative toxicity of three organic acids to freshwater organisms and their impact on aquatic ecosystems. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 2006;12(1):192-202 https://doi.org/10.1080/10807030500430625.
crossref
161. Serkan Yılmaz S, Ünal F, Aksoy H, Yüzbaşıoğlu D, Çelik M. Cytogenetic effects of citric acid and benzoic acid on Allium chromosomes. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 2008;17: 1029-1037.

162. Tiwari H, Prajapati SK. Allelopathic effect of benzoic acid (hydroponics root exudate) on microalgae growth. Environ Res 2023;219: 115020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.115020.
crossref pmid
163. Zhao YH, Ji GD, Cronin MT, Dearden JC. QSAR study of the toxicity of benzoic acids to Vibrio fischeri, Daphnia magna and carp. Sci Total Environ 1998;216(3):205-215 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-9697(98)00157-0.
crossref pmid
164. Katritzky AR, Slavov SH, Stoyanova-Slavova IS, Kahn I, Karelson M. Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship (QSAR) modeling of EC50 of aquatic toxicities for Daphnia magna. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A 2009;72(19):1181-1190 https://doi.org/10.1080/15287390903091863.
crossref pmid
165. Šepič E, Bricelj M, Leskovšek H. Toxicity of fluoranthene and its biodegradation metabolites to aquatic organisms. Chemosphere 2003;52(7):1125-1133 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00321-7.
crossref pmid
166. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). Benzoic acid. [cited Dec 8, 2024]. Available from: https://echa.europa.eu/registration-dossier/-/registered-dossier/13124.

Figure 1.
Flowchart illustrating of benzoic acid manufacturing process.
eaht-40-1-e2025007f1.jpg
Figure 2.
Flowchart illustrating of benzoic acid annual production and uses.
eaht-40-1-e2025007f2.jpg
Figure 3.
Entrance pathways of benzoic acid in the environment.
eaht-40-1-e2025007f3.jpg
Table 1.
Various research studies on benzoic acid treatment in wastewater..
Method Type BA Influent (mg/L) COD Influent (mg/L) BA Removal Rate (%) Reference
Adsorption Metal organic frameworks 1600 32900 66 [86]
Adsorption Metal organic frameworks 300 6000 50 [86]
Biofilm Constructed wetland biodegradation 48.7 -- 84.2 [121]
Biofilm Constructed wetland biodegradation 50 -- 90 [101]
AOP Catalytic ozonation 67.5 -- 88.3 [88]
AOP Electro-oxidation 400 1220 70.7 [122]
AOP Electro-Fenton 400 1220 80.4 [122]
Electrochemical Electrocoagulation - Al anode 400 706 70.5 [123]
Electrochemical Electrocoagulation - Fe anode 400 706 64.4 [123]
Membrane process Membrane-solvent extraction 2700 -- 95.9 [124]
Table 2.
Detected concentrations of benzoic acid in various environmental samples.
Sample type BA concentration (μg/L) Location Reference
Surface water 13.65-34.57 a China [143]
Surface water 206.3-230.45 b China [143]
Surface water 156.85-217.06 c China [143]
Surface water 16.15-38.67 d China [143]
Surface water 180 Taiwan [144]
Surface water 0.8 Germany [145]
Surface water 1.4-7.9 e Spain [146]
Surface water < 0.0006-8.5 Spain [146]
Surface water 3.944-4.821 f Malaysia [147]
Ground water 9488 g Germany [148]
Ground water 0.5 India [149]
Ground water 2208-9424 h UK [150]
Ground water 2500 g USA [151]
Ground water 0.072-161 Denmark [152]
Water sediment 2000-2700 k Taiwan [153]
Water sediment 460-5700 k USA [154]
Soil 1830-3270 k Russia [155]
Soil 12.2-24.4 k Russia [129]
Soil 3947.4-10.522.3 k Canada [156]

a samples were taken in spring season;

b samples were taken in summer season;

c samples were taken in autumn;

d samples were taken in winter;

e pond water;

f concentration presented as (chemical mass distribution %);

g contaminated groundwater;

h concentration unit is (integrated total ion current);

k unit is (μg/kg).

Table 3.
Some studies on benzoic acid toxicity in the environment.
Type Species Name Effect Duration Endpoint e Value (mg/L) Ref.
Soil toxicity Onion root Allium cepa Growth inhibition 48 h EC50 a 110 [72]
Aquatic toxicity Planktonic crustacean Daphnia magna Immobilization 48 h EC50 860 [158]
Aquatic toxicity Freshwater microalga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata Growth inhibition 48 h EC50 83.29 [159]
Aquatic toxicity Freshwater microalga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata Growth inhibition 48 h NOEC b 9.62 [159]
Aquatic toxicity Freshwater microalga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata Final yield inhibition 48 h EC50 36.39 [159]
Aquatic toxicity Freshwater microalga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata Final yield inhibition 48 h NOEC 4.81 [159]
Aquatic toxicity Freshwater Fish Oreochromis mossambicus Mortality 96 h EC50 276.74 [160]
Aquatic toxicity Freshwater crustacean Moina micrura Mortality 96 h EC50 71.65 [160]
Aquatic toxicity Surface water worm Branchiura sowerbyi Mortality 96 h EC50 39.47 [160]
Soil toxicity Garlic root Allium sativum l Chromosomal aberration 24 h Total abnormalityc 200 [161]
Soil toxicity Garlic root Allium sativum l Dividing cell inhibition 48 h Total abnormality 500 [161]
Aquatic toxicity Freshwater green microalga Chlorella pyrenoidosa Growth inhibition 96 h EC50 65.10 [162]
Aquatic toxicity Freshwater green microalga Chlorella sorokiniana Growth inhibition 96 h EC50 105.27 [162]
Aquatic toxicity Marine bacterium Vibrio fischeri Mortality 15 min EC50 9.93 [163]
Aquatic toxicity freshwater fish Cyprinus carpiol Mortality 48 h EC50 <500 [163]
Aquatic toxicity Planktonic crustacean Daphnia magna Mortality 48 h -log EC50 2.152 [164]
Aquatic toxicity Freshwater green algae Scenedesmus subspicatus Growth inhibition 7 days EC50 333 [165]
Aquatic and soil toxicity Water and soil bacterium Pseudomonas putida Growth inhibition 16 h EC50 144 [165]
Aquatic toxicity Planktonic crustacean Daphnia magna Immobilization 24 h E(L)C50 140 [165]
Aquatic toxicity Freshwater crustacean Thamnocephalus platyurus Immobilization 24 h E(L)C50 177 [165]

a EC50 is half effective concentration;

b NOEC is No-observed effect concentration;

c Total abnormality equals 52.27%;

d E(L)C50 is half effective lethal concentration.;

e The Predicted No-Effect Concentration (PNEC) of benzoic acid in the environment can vary depending on the environmental compartment.

For the lowest chronic NOEC for a sensitive aquatic species (e.g., Daphnia magna) of 10 mg/L, and an assessment factor of 100 is applied, the PNEC would be 0.1 mg/L. The NOEC for earthworms is 50 mg/kg soil, and an assessment factor of 100, the PNEC would be 0.5 mg/kg soil [166].

TOOLS
PDF Links  PDF Links
PubReader  PubReader
ePub Link  ePub Link
XML Download  XML Download
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
  Print
Share:      
METRICS
1
Crossref
0
Scopus
8,001
View
79
Download
Editorial Office
Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University
145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea
E-mail: envitoxic@gmail.com
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © 2026 by The Korean Society of Environmental Health and Toxicology & Korea Society for Environmental Analysis.     Developed in M2PI